2014
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201300153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the selfish gene to selfish metabolism: Revisiting the central dogma

Abstract: The standard representation of the Central Dogma (CD) of Molecular Biology conspicuously ignores metabolism. However, both the metabolites and the biochemical fluxes behind any biological phenomenon are encrypted in the DNA sequence. Metabolism constrains and even changes the information flow when the DNA-encoded instructions conflict with the homeostasis of the biochemical network. Inspection of adaptive virulence programs and emergence of xenobiotic-biodegradation pathways in environmental bacteria suggest t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are numerous circumstances in which metabolic processes causally control genetic ones (75)(76)(77), despite the fact that doing so requires a reversal of the normal explanatory order. The redox control of transcription in chloroplast-bearing cells is a clear illustration of how such a "reverse" explanation can work (77).…”
Section: Metabolic Evolutionary Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are numerous circumstances in which metabolic processes causally control genetic ones (75)(76)(77), despite the fact that doing so requires a reversal of the normal explanatory order. The redox control of transcription in chloroplast-bearing cells is a clear illustration of how such a "reverse" explanation can work (77).…”
Section: Metabolic Evolutionary Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical "central dogma" of molecular biology establishes the preeminence of genes over the rest of elements in the chain of information transmission (Crick, 1958;Morange, 2008). However, an insightful discussion by de Lorenzo (2014) shows that current biochemical knowledge demands an expansion of the canonical view of the "central dogma" where metabolism takes a leading role, as the ultimate source of materials for the construction of the rest of the involved elements (DNA, RNA, proteins). In other words, the metabolome is a product of the proteome and the genome/transcriptome/proteome is a product of the metabolome (Cornish-Bowden et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the metabolome is a product of the proteome and the genome/transcriptome/proteome is a product of the metabolome (Cornish-Bowden et al, 2007). But de Lorenzo (2014) thinking goes further to the observation that one of the driving forces in bacterial evolution is the exploration/exploitation of new chemical landscapes. Small cells with small genomes show that this goal can be achieved by reductive evolution throughout the sharing of metabolic networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest taking such a metabolic viewpoint in order to obtain more functional insight into the role or similarity of the cells examined, complementary to that based on DNA sequences. This would reflect the observation that the physiology of microbes, of which metabolism is a key component, might be the key driver for their evolution (89). Regarded from this viewpoint, the Alteromonas and Pseudoalteromonas strains of Gammaproteobacteria clustered with Leeuwenhoekiella sp.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 93%