2016
DOI: 10.1080/13552074.2016.1145895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the Millennium Development Goals to the Sustainable Development Goals: shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
182
0
16

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
182
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The SDGs signal a shift in institutional focus from the MDGs (Fukuda-Parr, 2016) which communicated a simplified concept of development as meeting basic needs, without mentioning the need to reform institutions. Several authors warned that the ''negotiations around the post-2015 development agenda should go beyond just re-writing goals and targets that adhere to ''sustaining'' the same old economic and social models'' (Moore, 2015: 801).…”
Section: The Sdgs As a Goal-based Institutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SDGs signal a shift in institutional focus from the MDGs (Fukuda-Parr, 2016) which communicated a simplified concept of development as meeting basic needs, without mentioning the need to reform institutions. Several authors warned that the ''negotiations around the post-2015 development agenda should go beyond just re-writing goals and targets that adhere to ''sustaining'' the same old economic and social models'' (Moore, 2015: 801).…”
Section: The Sdgs As a Goal-based Institutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, publications in this field have focused on the post-2015 consultations, intergovernmental negotiations and the substantive increase in scope from the MDGs to the SDGs (e.g. Chasek et al, 2016;Fejerskov, 2016;Fukuda-Parr, 2016;Vandemoortele, 2014). A nascent literature usefully identifies challenges involved in realising the new goals and future accountability matters (Berensmann et al, 2015;Donald and Way, 2016;Fukuda-Parr and McNeill, 2015;Ocampo and Gómez-Arteaga, 2016;Pogge and Sengupta, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note: The vertical axis displays the scores as assessed by decision-makers, and the horizontal axis displays the assessment indicators randomly organized by criterion. Table 3, the relative weights of environmental value, economic value, and social value perceived by the public sector, non-profit organizations, and the private sector were (28,43,29), (41,20,39), and (15,54,31), respectively. The results showed that although the public and private sectors viewed local sustainable development differently, they both assigned the greatest importance to economic value.…”
Section: Function Formmentioning
confidence: 99%