2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0923-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From uni- to multimodality: towards an integrative view on anuran communication

Abstract: Undeniably, acoustic signals are the predominant mode of communication in frogs and toads. Acoustically active species are found throughout the vast diversity of anuran families. However, additional or alternative signal modalities have gained increasing attention. In several anurans, seismic, visual and chemical communications have convergently evolved due to ecological constraints such as noisy environments. The production of a visual cue, like the inevitably moving vocal sac of acoustically advertising male… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
(180 reference statements)
0
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations of this approach, such as the difficulty of considering interactions between signal components and the possibility of individual signals having multiple functions, led to a suite of follow-up frameworks focused on intersignal interactions and potential sources of selection on signals [4,7,8,24]. The field has since been accruing multiple excellent case studies of complex signalling, including grounddwelling spiders (reviewed in [25,26]), crustaceans (reviewed in [27]), anurans ( [28], reviewed in [29]), insect pollinators (reviewed in [23,30]), birds [31,32], and primates [33,34], among others. Results from these studies and others have led to an appreciation that the function(s) of elements of communication displays are not fixed.…”
Section: Current State Of the Field (A) Modelling Multiple Signals Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of this approach, such as the difficulty of considering interactions between signal components and the possibility of individual signals having multiple functions, led to a suite of follow-up frameworks focused on intersignal interactions and potential sources of selection on signals [4,7,8,24]. The field has since been accruing multiple excellent case studies of complex signalling, including grounddwelling spiders (reviewed in [25,26]), crustaceans (reviewed in [27]), anurans ( [28], reviewed in [29]), insect pollinators (reviewed in [23,30]), birds [31,32], and primates [33,34], among others. Results from these studies and others have led to an appreciation that the function(s) of elements of communication displays are not fixed.…”
Section: Current State Of the Field (A) Modelling Multiple Signals Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such crossmodal perceptual weighting reduces the masking impact of noise and could be a general receiver strategy (11,28). A shift in the use of signals and cues across sensory systems will also alter selection pressures acting on sexual displays (29,30). Thus, in noisy human-impacted areas such as in cities or along highways, we would expect to find a change in the multimodal content of communication signals (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like most frogs, S. parvus males use acoustic signals for intraspecific communication in reproductive contexts (22,23). However, in addition to vocalizations, male S. parvus signal using highly conspicuous hind leg movements, known as "foot flags" (22)(23)(24). This behavior is performed by fully extending a hind limb above the head, rotating it backward in an arc to expose white-colored foot webbing, and then retracting the leg back to the body ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%