2010
DOI: 10.1201/b10830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Water Scarcity to Sustainable Water Use in the West Bank, Palestine

Abstract: All rights reserved. No part of this publication or the information contained herein may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without written prior permission from the publisher. Although care is taken to ensure the integrity and quality of this publication and the information therein, no responsibility is assumed by the publishers nor the author for any damage to property or persons as a resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that 8 litres of water was used for flushing toilets irrespective of the type of waste. These results are contrary to the recommendations by Nazer (2010) Further observations made in the toilets revealed unsustainable indoor water use because there were no small containers in 69 (55%) toilets (Table 1). Users of these toilets use 8 litres of water to flush liquid wastes such as urine and sputum.…”
Section: Largecontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that 8 litres of water was used for flushing toilets irrespective of the type of waste. These results are contrary to the recommendations by Nazer (2010) Further observations made in the toilets revealed unsustainable indoor water use because there were no small containers in 69 (55%) toilets (Table 1). Users of these toilets use 8 litres of water to flush liquid wastes such as urine and sputum.…”
Section: Largecontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Regarding technological changes, Grosvenor (2008) suggests the installation of water-efficient appliances, including toilets that use less water of about 3-6 litres depending on the requirements. Dual-flusher toilets with two buttons or handles to flush different levels of water can also be used where a 3-and 6-litre tank is used for flushing liquid and solid wastes, respectively (Nazer, 2010). Other technological measures are the use of low-flow showerheads and aerators, which are installed at the tips of the taps to decrease water flow up to 60 percent, while maintaining wetting effectiveness (Skipton & Dvorak, 2013).…”
Section: Conceptualising Sustainable Indoor Water Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the proposed impact assessment framework will be more effective by evaluating livelihood assets of community people (Scoones, 1998;Ellis, 1999;DFID, 2000), the performance of TRM operation and its institutional set up. By providing strengths and opportunities or weaknesses and threats information (Nazer, 2009;Beckanov, 2010), the benefits will come from a group of ecosystem services by trade-offs (Falkenmark, 2003;Tallis et al, 2008) and by properly monetarising an ecosystem service (Springate-Baginski et al, 2009;WMO, 2012;Schagner et al, 2013;Hossain et al, 2016) with both economic and environmental value to understand risks or opportunities than those of mentioned frameworks. Sixthly, the framework will project the future vulnerability focus on water supply, ecological assessment and disaster risk reduction (Sullivan, 2010;Gain et al, 2012a;Doczi, 2014;Vollmer et al, 2016) by rainfall and weather forecast (Wu et al, 2010;Chau et al, 2010;Pallavi and Singh, 2016;Vivekanandan, 2016) as well as rainfall runoff predictions (Walker et al, 2014;Sarkar and Kumar, 2012;Mittal et al, 2012) for water-logging in the floodplain area, sediment and water flow forecast (Mostafa et al, 2012;Krishna et al, 2010;Shabani and Shabani, 2012) for drainage congestion of the tidal river and rising sea levels projections (Pashova and Popova, 2011;Rafiean and Aliei, 2013;Goharnejad, et al, 2013) for the floodplain community, tidal river and Tidal Basin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainable livelihood approach is a checklist that can be used for livelihood analysis to assess the fitness of development activities in the livelihood of the poor (Kollmair and Gamper, 2002). Nazer (2009), Beckanov (2010) demonstrated Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat (SWOT) analysis for sustainable water use, technical feasibility and economic efficiency in water resource sustainability. Therefore, livelihood analysis and SWOT analysis are important to understand risks and opportunities in the field of sustainability.…”
Section: Sustainability Concepts Principles and Water Resource Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrogeological vulnerability of groundwater to pollution in the West Bank is high as Israel is already using almost 80 percent of the annual safe yield of the groundwater basins shared with the West Bank and the unmet demand encourages over-exploitation (Nazer, 2010;Mehyar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Jordan Valley Unified Water Plan Aka Johnston Planmentioning
confidence: 99%