From ϕvσις to Nature, τε′χνη to Technology: Heidegger on Aristotle, Galileo, and Newton

Glazebrook, Trish

doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2000.tb00892.x

Cited by 36 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…I refer the reader to the following texts: Blattner (1994Blattner ( , 2004; Bourgeois & Rosenthal (1988); Cerbone (1995Cerbone ( , 2005; Dreyfus (1991Dreyfus ( , 2001; Dreyfus & Spinosa (1999);Hoffman (2000); Leung (2006); Schatzki (1992); Stepanich (1991); Tanzer (1995Tanzer ( , 1998and Tiez (1993). Glazebrook (2001a) brings much of this debate into conversation with recent work in the philosophy of science.…”

Section: Rouse Against Realism and Antirealismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger

Kochan

2011

Perspectives on Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Joseph Rouse has drawn from Heidegger's early philosophy to develop what he calls a "practical hermeneutics of science." With this, he has not only become an important player in the recent trend towards practice-based conceptualisations of science, he has also emerged as the predominant expositor of Heidegger's philosophy of science. Yet, there are serious shortcomings in both Rouse's theory of science and his interpretation of Heidegger. In the ªrst instance, Rouse's practical hermeneutics appears confused on the topic of realism. In the second instance, Rouse suppresses Heidegger's distinction between existence and essence, and hence fails to grasp the latter's corollary distinction between scientiªc research and everyday practice. I argue that, by accepting a correction in his interpretation of Heidegger, Rouse would ªnd the means to resolve the debilitating tensions in his stance towards realism.

show abstract

Section: Rouse Against Realism and Antirealismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger

Kochan

2011

Perspectives on Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…12 For an excellent discussion of the relationship between art, technology, and nature see Glazebrook (2000). 13 For a thorough consideration of Heidegger and Plato see Partenie and Rockmore (forthcoming).…”

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

Techne, Technology, and Tragedy

Tabachnick¹

2004

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…II TRUTH AS "ALETHEIA": DEEPENING HEIDEGGER'S "DIALECTICS OF THE ORIGIN" AS TO HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY INTO THE PYTHAGOREANS, OR BACK TO THE HIDDEN BEGINNING OF PHILOSOPHY, "SUNK INTO OBLIVION" One might say that "Heidegger II's" (i.e., after the "turn") philosophical worldview will be now discussed instead of "Heidegger I's" meant above, though in the same context of ontomathematics. The approach can be briefly concentrated on Heidegger's destruction of the history of philosophy investigating the origin of Western philosophy from Plato and Aristotle 6 6 There exists a series of papers considering Heideger's reinterpretation of both Plato and Aristotle (e.g., Montgomery 2020;Chamberlain 2019;Gonzalez 2019;2019a;2018;Choi, Dattilo 2017;Lee 2016;Kockelman 2015;McNeill 2015;Adluri, Brogan 2013;Weidenfeld 2011;Jaran 2010;Keane 2010;Phillips 2009;Gonzalez 2008a;McGuirk 2008;Wolff 2008;Duro 2007;Brogan 2005;Bowler 2008;Hayes 2007;Kirkland 2007;Kress 2006;Chan 2005;Elden 2005;Wrathall 2004;Smith 2003;Baruchello 2001;Elliott 2000;Glazebrook 2000;Hanley 1999;McNeill 1999;Warnek 1997;Protevi 1994;Baur 1992;Bernasconi 1990;Makkreel 1990;Eiland 1989;Fóti 198...…”

Section: Instead Of Introduction: Heidegger's Distinction Between The...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hilbert mathematics versus (or rather “without”) Gödel mathematics: V. Ontomathematics!

Penchev

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper is the final, fifth part of a series of studies introducing the new conceptions of“Hilbert mathematics” and “ontomathematics”. The specific subject of the present investigation is theproper philosophical sense of both, including philosophy of mathematics and philosophy of physics notless than the traditional “first philosophy” (as far as ontomathematics is a conservative generalization ofontology as well as of Heidegger’s “fundamental ontology” though in a sense) and history of philosophy(deepening Heidegger’s destruction of it from the pre-Socratics to the Pythagoreans). Husserl’sphenomenology and Heidegger’s derivative “fundamental ontology” as well as his later doctrine after the“turn” are the starting point of the research as established and well known approaches relative to thenewly introduced conception of ontomathematics, even more so that Husserl himself started criticizing his“Philosophy of arithmetic” as too naturalistic and psychological turning to “Logical investigations” andthe foundations of phenomenology. Heidegger’s “Aletheia” is also interpreted ontomathematically: as arelation of locality and nonlocality, respectively as a motion from nonlocality to locality if both arephysically considered. Aristotle’s ontological revision of Plato’s doctrine is “destructed” further from thepre-Socratics' “Logos” or Heideger’s “Language” (after the “turn”) to the Pythagoreans “Numbers” or“Arithmetics” as an inherent and fundamental philosophical doctrine. Then, a leap to contemporaryphysics elucidates the essence of ontomathematics overcoming the Cartesian abyss inherited from Plato’sopposition of “ideas” versus “things”, and now unifying physics and mathematics, particularly allowingfor the “creation from nothing” instead of the quasi-scientific myth of the “Big Bang”. Furthermore,ontomathematics needs another interpretation of arithmetic, propositional logic and set theory in thefoundations of mathematics, where the latter two ones are both identified with Boolean algebra, and theformer is considered to be a “half of Boolean algebra” in the exact meaning to be equated to it afterdoubling by a dual anti-isometric counterpart of Peano arithmetic. That unified algebraic realization of thefoundations of mathematics is related to Hilbert mathematics in both “narrow and wide senses” where thelatter is isomorphic to the qubit Hilbert space, thus underlying all the physical world by the newlyintroduced substance of quantum information being physically dimensionless and generalizing classicalinformation measured in bits. The substance of information, whether classical or quantum, visualizes theway of the unification of physics and mathematics by merging their foundations in Hilbert arithmetic andHilbert mathematics: thus how ontomathetics is a “first philosophy”. The relation of ontomathematics tothe Socratic “human problematics”, furthermore being fundamental for Western philosophy in Modernity,is discussed. Ontomathematics implies its “substitution” by abstract information (or by “subjectlesschoice” relevant to it), thus “obliterating the human outline on the ocean beach sand” (by MichelFoucault’s metaphor). A reflection back from the viewpoint of mathematic to Western philosophy as thephilosophy of locality ends the study.

show abstract

From ϕvσις to Nature, τε′χνη to Technology: Heidegger on Aristotle, Galileo, and Newton

Cited by 36 publications

References 10 publications

Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger

Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger

Techne, Technology, and Tragedy

Hilbert mathematics versus (or rather “without”) Gödel mathematics: V. Ontomathematics!

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About