2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23911-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Front Tracking for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
292
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(296 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
292
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that Godunov's flux has less regularity. For f ∈ C 1 , the spatial L 1 error is O(( z) r ) with r = 1/2; see [43][44][45]. Consider now the more general strongly degenerate parabolic equation X t + f (X) z = D(X ) zz , which is the type we have within the clarification and thickening zones.…”
Section: Efficiencies Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that Godunov's flux has less regularity. For f ∈ C 1 , the spatial L 1 error is O(( z) r ) with r = 1/2; see [43][44][45]. Consider now the more general strongly degenerate parabolic equation X t + f (X) z = D(X ) zz , which is the type we have within the clarification and thickening zones.…”
Section: Efficiencies Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It consists in computing two compression fluxes K^\"j and K^l"-, using respectively the x-and y-derivatives in the equation (5). Then these fluxes are apphed alternatively in each direction, using nearly the same formula as (6), up to the CFL condition that gets a little more restrictive (X < j). As we will see in the numerical results presented in the talk, this version of ACM has inherited from the very good compressivity of its one-dimensional counterpart.…”
Section: Extension Of Acm To Cartesian Two-dimensional Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore will only be applying ACM, once again using (6) in the ^-direction. The determination ofK^ \"j will still follow (5), except that directional derivatives will be used.…”
Section: The Directional Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations