2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal plane alignment: An imageless method to predict the mechanical femoral–tibial angle (mFTA) based on functional determination of joint centres and axes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, despite possible inter-observer variability in marker placement, a high degree of reliability has been demonstrated in both segment lengths and in the quality of joint identification (using the SCoRE residual [23,24]). Furthermore, this functional approach can also offer access to accurate postural information (lower limb alignment), agreeing better with radiological findings than regression techniques [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, despite possible inter-observer variability in marker placement, a high degree of reliability has been demonstrated in both segment lengths and in the quality of joint identification (using the SCoRE residual [23,24]). Furthermore, this functional approach can also offer access to accurate postural information (lower limb alignment), agreeing better with radiological findings than regression techniques [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…1), which has been described previously [21], consisted of a minimum of four reflective markers attached to the skin of each segment (pelvis, thigh, shank and foot) of the lower limb using double sided tape. Additional markers were placed on specific bone landmarks (via palpation); for the pelvis, the right anterior superior iliac spine (RASIS), left anterior superior iliac spine (LASIS), right posterior superior iliac spine (RPSIS) and left posterior superior iliac spine (LPSIS); for the knee at the medial and lateral epicondyles; and for the ankle on the medial and lateral malleoli.…”
Section: Marker Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all care taken in marker placement on subjects and in ensuring model scaling errors were minimized, a 4° bias between marker‐based and radiographic static alignment measures occurred (Table ). In our high‐BMI subjects this result was likely due to disparities in hip‐joint center location, an important factor for accurately determining alignment . Bias in marker‐based dynamic alignment measures can be variable .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Limb alignment in the coronal plane was calculated using the marker data, saving the potential radiation dose associated with x-rays [20]. Other authors have previously demonstrated good correlation between limb alignment measured using radiographic and marker-based techniques [22], [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%