2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fri.2020.200407
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal sinus index for sex estimation: Is it possible?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, some studies showed diversity results from ours as ElBeshlawy & Helaly who found that the FS index could only act as a poor sex predictor [11] . This might be due to their different methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, some studies showed diversity results from ours as ElBeshlawy & Helaly who found that the FS index could only act as a poor sex predictor [11] . This might be due to their different methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Frontal sinus is one of the imaged anatomical landmarks that is unique in shape and may be described as fingerprint-like individuality, hence frontal sinus index (FSI) can be used in personal identification for forensic purposes [8] . Previous studies measured FSI and correlated it to gender are not only limited and contradicting but also lack a reliable standardized way of application [9][10][11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the different skeletal characteristics of Indian population from Egyptian one with genetic dissimilarities and different dietary habits resulting in different anatomical features. 28 ElBeshlawy & Helaly, 2020 20 found that the FSI (Protocol 1) calculated from lateral cephalometric measurements was significantly higher in males than females above 18 years. Also, in their ROC analysis results, the FSI could only act as poor sex predictors (AUC: 0.66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). 20 For the second protocol, the width was taken by connecting the most anterior wall of the sinus at its deepest portion to the maximum height line through a perpendicular line reaching the posterior frontal sinus border (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%