2018 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cac.2018.8623178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fruit Fly Classification via Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If adopting the classic deep networks directly, e.g., the MobileNet-V2 [56], VGG16 [57], DenseNet121 [58], and ResNet50 [48], the roles of local features from local parts will not be well executed because the global high-level semantic features are used for the classification of species. Especially, most of the recent research on recognizing fruit flies [24,[27][28][29][30]60] directly utilized or combined the existing classic networks. Compared with them, in our MAMPNet, the local parts are located by and focused on the attention mechanism, and their features are combined with the global features for classifying the species.…”
Section: Discussion On Recognition Of Citrus Fliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If adopting the classic deep networks directly, e.g., the MobileNet-V2 [56], VGG16 [57], DenseNet121 [58], and ResNet50 [48], the roles of local features from local parts will not be well executed because the global high-level semantic features are used for the classification of species. Especially, most of the recent research on recognizing fruit flies [24,[27][28][29][30]60] directly utilized or combined the existing classic networks. Compared with them, in our MAMPNet, the local parts are located by and focused on the attention mechanism, and their features are combined with the global features for classifying the species.…”
Section: Discussion On Recognition Of Citrus Fliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, advancements in deep learning have led to a great deal of Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs)-based works for the identification of fruit flies' species [27][28][29][30][31], which demonstrates the strong robustness and capability of CNNs in contrast to the handcrafted descriptors. However, most work directly adopts existing pre-trained models or fine-trains them to perform classifications [27][28][29][30][31], which omits the characteristic of finegrained classification in this recognition task of citrus flies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The damage caused by economically important fruit flies could also be significantly reduced by using automatic or semi-automatic image analysis systems [22]. Due to the shortcomings of conventional fruit fly classification systems, Peng et al [122] proposed a convolutional neural network algorithm that automatically extracts features to build a classification model for the four Bactrocera species. The developed model automatically extracts the features of the fruit fly pests for effective identification with an accuracy rate of 97.19% and solves the problems caused by the manual classification methods.…”
Section: Fruit Flies (Tephritidae Drosophilidae)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification accuracy obtained is 96.75% [4]. Another classification model based on a convolutional neural network that is capable of extracting the features automatically with an accuracy of 97.19% [5]. A fully convolutional network (FCN) is trained and segmented the image in two categories: one in the fruit pixels and other in non-fruit pixels [6].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%