2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12355-020-00873-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel Consumption Between Two Soil Tillage Systems for Planting Sugarcane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Although no-tillage has shown lower productivity, the use of this system can be advantageous from an economic point of view, as there is a reduction in energy expenditure in soil preparation and thus it becomes a viable alternative to sugarcane cultivation, as it presents stalk productivity similar to other soil preparations [49]. The costs involved in the soil preparation process can also impact the decision of which model to use (Souza et al) [50], such as fuel consumption, which is one of the main costs involved, where Martins et al [51], studying the fuel consumption between two soil preparation systems for planting sugarcane, found that in conventional soil preparation there is the highest fuel consumption due to the greater number of implements needed for the activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Although no-tillage has shown lower productivity, the use of this system can be advantageous from an economic point of view, as there is a reduction in energy expenditure in soil preparation and thus it becomes a viable alternative to sugarcane cultivation, as it presents stalk productivity similar to other soil preparations [49]. The costs involved in the soil preparation process can also impact the decision of which model to use (Souza et al) [50], such as fuel consumption, which is one of the main costs involved, where Martins et al [51], studying the fuel consumption between two soil preparation systems for planting sugarcane, found that in conventional soil preparation there is the highest fuel consumption due to the greater number of implements needed for the activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Martins et al (2021), the revolved soil volume and fuel consumption during soil tillage are directly related to the set operational speed. However, Pequeno et al (2012), when analyzing the performance of light harrowing with cutout discs, found that the speed increase reduced the grid's acting depth, creating the effect called fluctuation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil physical attributes typically change during the sugarcane cultivation period, and these changes may impact crop development and yield (Cherubin et al, 2017). The cost of preparing the soil for sugarcane field implantation is equivalent to approximately one‐fourth of the crop yield (Martins et al, 2021). Hence, the choice of soil preparation systems has a substantial impact on sugarcane yield, longevity and maximum economic return (Blanco‐Canqui et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total area to be planted is typically subjected to conventional soil preparation (ploughing and harrowing) and scarification to improve root development and crop yield (de Campos, Rossato, et al, 2022). However, in the long term, this preparation accentuates soil degradation, changes soil attributes, causes erosion and compaction, alters water flow and increases CO 2 emissions and production costs because of the greater energy input required for full‐area scarification (Filho et al, 2017; Marasca et al, 2015; Martins et al, 2021; Tim Chamen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%