2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11149-017-9319-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel inventory and price relationships in the U.S. electric power sector under regulatory and market change

Abstract: Long-run relationships among coal inventories at U.S. electric power plants, corporate bond rates and coal, natural gas, and electricity prices are estimated over the period July 1976 to October 2014. Tests for constancy of the long-run relationships show periods of instability which coincide with major regulatory events in the electric power sector. Deregulation of the natural gas and electricity markets are likely sources of instability for the period mid-1994 to mid-2001. Additionally, inventory behavior ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some examples: although the 2002 unbundling reform in the Chinese electricity sector contributed to efficiency improvement (Ma and Zhao, 2015), there are still regulations on price and quantity that affect the efficiency of power plants (Sun and Wu, 2020); the U.S. electricity market restructuring imposed a negative effect on technical efficiency of utilities (Gultom, 2019); Australian distributors operate below efficient levels even after the deregulation that has been ongoing since 1998 (Lee et al, 2021); finally, efficiency in Pakistan's electricity market still suffers from multiple practical difficulties after reform (Mirza et al, 2021). Meanwhile, in some cases, deregulation may bring about instability in electricity markets (Binder and Mjelde, 2017), or result in efficiency loss due to mandated divestiture of generation assets or higher upstream transaction costs (Leung et al, 2019); environmental regulations may also affect efficiency in the energy sector (Hu et al, 2023). Barros (2008) applies DEA to find improvement in the technical efficiency of hydroelectric plants in Portugal between 2000 and2004. Nevertheless, it was only in 2006 that the new legislation defined the regime for electricity generation in the country.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples: although the 2002 unbundling reform in the Chinese electricity sector contributed to efficiency improvement (Ma and Zhao, 2015), there are still regulations on price and quantity that affect the efficiency of power plants (Sun and Wu, 2020); the U.S. electricity market restructuring imposed a negative effect on technical efficiency of utilities (Gultom, 2019); Australian distributors operate below efficient levels even after the deregulation that has been ongoing since 1998 (Lee et al, 2021); finally, efficiency in Pakistan's electricity market still suffers from multiple practical difficulties after reform (Mirza et al, 2021). Meanwhile, in some cases, deregulation may bring about instability in electricity markets (Binder and Mjelde, 2017), or result in efficiency loss due to mandated divestiture of generation assets or higher upstream transaction costs (Leung et al, 2019); environmental regulations may also affect efficiency in the energy sector (Hu et al, 2023). Barros (2008) applies DEA to find improvement in the technical efficiency of hydroelectric plants in Portugal between 2000 and2004. Nevertheless, it was only in 2006 that the new legislation defined the regime for electricity generation in the country.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%