2011
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2011.561807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel quality of Norway spruce stumps – influence of harvesting technique and storage method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent results imply, however, that a substantial part of the cleaning process depends on the transportation, handling and storage of the stumps and that the initial shaking might not be as important (cf. Anerud & Jirjis 2011). Less initial shaking of the stumps should increase stump harvesting productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recent results imply, however, that a substantial part of the cleaning process depends on the transportation, handling and storage of the stumps and that the initial shaking might not be as important (cf. Anerud & Jirjis 2011). Less initial shaking of the stumps should increase stump harvesting productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…** 1 oven-dry tonne equals to 5.2 MWh, assuming a calorific value of 20.0 MJ/ODkg for stumps with a natural ash content of 1.0% (cf. Anerud & Jirjis 2011) and a moisture content of 35%. ***The excavator cost is assumed to be 77 €/PWH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly, these fuels must be both economically and ecologically acceptable (Anerud and Jirjis 2011), and attractive sources are residue stumps from forestry. However, use of stumps is currently very limited in Sweden (Anerud and Jirjis 2011) as Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) members can only harvest them from 2500 hectares per year nationally, due to ecological concerns (FSC 2012). This is a tiny proportion of the average annual clear cutting area of about 200 000 ha (Christiansen 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%