Fuel subsidy reform and the social contract in Nigeria: A micro-economic analysis

Abstract

Fuel subsidies in Nigeria are enormous – around USD 3.9 billion – almost double the health budget. Such subsidies come at great cost: the opportunity costs of such spending on other development objectives are large; the distribution of resources to the state governments is reduced; the vast majority of the subsidy goes to better off Nigerians; and cheaper petrol encourages greater pollution, congestion and climate change. Despite this, most Nigerians oppose the reduction of subsidies. We draw on a new nationally representative household survey that asked Nigerian men and women about their knowledge and attitudes towards subsidies. We construct and test a set of hypotheses about the factors associated with support for subsidy reform. We find that those who pay more or who experience less availability of fuel tend to support reform more. On the other hand, people who believe the Government is corrupt or lacks the capacity to implement compensation programs appear strongly opposed to reform. Finally, being religious and the delivery of reasonable national and local services also improves the acceptance of reform. These results support the idea that building a social contract is key to reform success.

Exploring the role of electric vehicles in Africa's energy transition: A Nigerian case study

“…The federal government of Nigeria (FGN) heavily subsidizes transport fuels, especially gasoline. The FGN spends around US$3.9 billion on fuel subsidies, which, is almost double the health budget and 2% of the gross domestic product (GDP) ( McCulloch et al., 2021 ). As Nigerian cities expand, the demand for oil will increase, resulting in increased fuel scarcity, cost burden problems, and environmental pollution ( Dioha and Kumar, 2020a ).…”

The impact of fossil fuel subsidies on income inequality: accounting for the interactive roles of corruption and economic uncertainty

“…There are also cost of subsidies beyond the fiscal cost of subsidies. The cost of negative externalities triggered by fossil fuels and such subsidies include road damage, accidents and congestion (McCulloch et al. , 2021).…”

The Determining Factors of Consumer Behavior to Substitute RON-88 (Premium) Fuel Consumption to Pertalite and Pertamax Fuel

“…The education level variable was also used in several similar studies. According to Mcculloch, N et al and Swain & Mishra literate household heads will choose fuels that are easily affordable to use [20]. This shows that the level of education is not so influential, especially when fuel is not easily available [21].…”