Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Environment and Engineering Geophysics &Amp; Summit Forum of Chinese Academy 2016
DOI: 10.2991/iceeg-16.2016.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full field apparent resistivity definition of Borehole TEM with electric source

Abstract: Grounded electric source Borehole TEM is introduced in this paper to find the deep conductive ore body, particularly in areas where the ability of surface TEM to define a target is limited either by large depths or by interfering conductive bodies such as overburden shallow sulphides and peripheral mineralized horizons. In this method the grounded electric transmit system is deployed on the surface and receive the three-component TEM response along borehole. As receiver is nearer to ore body through the boreho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper attempts to improve the ability to distinguish the anomaly and realize the fine detection of the deep structure. For this, the paper draws on the research results of the amplitude difference between the electromagnetic signals in the disturbance and the intact coal seam by Greenfield and Wu [20], and redefines the EA calculation method in equation (4). Then, it draws the EA multi-track curve with single anomaly and different lines, as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Ground-tunnel Observation Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper attempts to improve the ability to distinguish the anomaly and realize the fine detection of the deep structure. For this, the paper draws on the research results of the amplitude difference between the electromagnetic signals in the disturbance and the intact coal seam by Greenfield and Wu [20], and redefines the EA calculation method in equation (4). Then, it draws the EA multi-track curve with single anomaly and different lines, as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Ground-tunnel Observation Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eaton and Hohmann [1], West and Ward [2] used the integral equation to study the anomalous G-W TEM field response characteristics under long wire sources; Yang et al [3] established a three-dimensional geological model and the overlay model, to analyse the response characteristics of the square low-resistance object and overburden layers as well as the influence factors of the overlayer. Wu et al [4] defined the global apparent resistivity of grounded source G-W TEM; in literature [5] they verified the effectiveness of G-W TEM for determining electrical interface under the condition of electrical emission source; their study in [6] further showed that the three-component transient response curve of G-W TEM has a good response to electrical interfaces and anomality. Xu et al [7] studied the vertical contact zone and its G-W TEM response characteristics when containing low resistance bodies; they also performed forward modelling of uniform half-space and vertical fault planes [8], and carried out three-dimensional forward modelling of G-W TEM, summarizing the main factors affecting G-W TEM anomalies [9]; Meng and Pan [10] calculated the G-W TEM anomaly response of low-resistance plate-shaped conductors in the case of homogeneous half-space and low-resistance coating, and studied the response characteristics and laws; Meng et al [11] believe that the response obtained by G-W TEM observation is the result of the interaction between the surrounding rock background field and the target anomaly field, and proposed that the earth medium will affect the observation results; Meng et al [12] calculated and analysed the multi-component response of the G-W TEM, obtaining the results that the response characteristics depend on the "diffusion, attenuation, distortion" process of the transient field in the formation under different conditions and the electromagnetic field state of the observed position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1D inversion and apparent resistivity interpretation methods are suitable for understanding the electrical distribution of background strata, which is not conducive to displaying local targets [10][11][12][13][14]. The equivalent current filaments method can roughly delineate the scope and central position of the target body [15][16][17], but at present, there needs to be equivalence in the inversion of borehole data to some extent, which is not accurate enough to reflect the information of the target bodies [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meng and Pan (2012) studied the surface-hole TEM responses of a conductive plate and analyzed the effect of conductive overburden [22]. Wu et al (2017) studied the approximate processing method of electric source borehole TEM and defined the full-field apparent resistivity [23]. Chen et al (2019) analyzed the full-component response of electric source surface-to-borehole TEM [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%