2009
DOI: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full identification of acoustic sources with multiple frequencies and boundary measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, however, the source can be identified from an infinite number of boundary measurements by varying the wavenumber (cf. [8]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this case, however, the source can be identified from an infinite number of boundary measurements by varying the wavenumber (cf. [8]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Meanwhile, the nonuniqueness source identification allows minimum norm (energy) solutions [19,30,29] where physical constraints are naturally included. To uniquely identify the unknown sources, multifrequency measurements are employed in [1,2,12,22]. In all these works the unknown sources are represented by a linear combination of different basis functions, for instance, the standard Fourier basis functions in [2], finite element basis functions in [12], and eigenfunctions of Dirichlet eigenvalue problems for homogeneous and nonhomogeneous media in [1,22], respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One serious issue here is the uniqueness of solution from a single pair of Cauchy data (7) and (8). Unlike the inverse conductivity problem of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in which the knowledge of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map suffices to determine uniquely an isotropic conductivity, in the problem under investigation a single pair of Cauchy data contains all the information necessary for reconstruction, see Alves et al (2009), in the sense that any other Cauchy data pair does not add any further information. Thus, one could take, without loss of generality, homogeneous Dirichlet data f ≡ 0 in (7) and non-identically zero Neumann data 0 ≡ g ∈ H −1/2 (∂Ω) in (8).…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%