2017
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full Percutaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note

Abstract: Introduction Although lumbar interbody fusion is effective for low back pain caused by severe disk degeneration, it is a highly invasive procedure. Less invasive procedures such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and lumbar lateral interbody fusion have become available; however, there is still scope for improvement. We performed full percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF), a technique designed as a safe and less invasive percutaneous fusion. Method and Subjects Our t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the operation time of endoscope-assisted LIF, a standard approach in our hospital, was 102 (range, 59–162) min [ 24 ], 109.4 min was not significantly different from the operative time for the conventional approach. Likewise, the mean operation time was not inferior to that reported in previous FELIF studies (84.5–285.7 min) [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Presently, we only perform FELIF for patients with LDD with disc height loss; the removal of the disc material is not a time-consuming step.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the operation time of endoscope-assisted LIF, a standard approach in our hospital, was 102 (range, 59–162) min [ 24 ], 109.4 min was not significantly different from the operative time for the conventional approach. Likewise, the mean operation time was not inferior to that reported in previous FELIF studies (84.5–285.7 min) [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Presently, we only perform FELIF for patients with LDD with disc height loss; the removal of the disc material is not a time-consuming step.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Previously, LIF was performed using open, microscopic, or endoscope-assisted surgical approaches. In contrast, uniportal full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) was originally introduced for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and has recently been performed during posterior, lateral, and transforaminal LIF [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Among these approaches, transforaminal LIF through Kambin’s triangle seems to be the most commonly used approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%