2017
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2017.1376128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-polarimetric SAR measurements for coastline extraction and coastal area classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it must be stressed that in case of long-term analysis of coastal erosion/accretion processes, the shift experienced by the shoreline extracted from SAR imagery represents a bias that may affect the whole time series in the same way, without affecting the analysis of global trends. Anyway, it was shown that the exploitation of quad-polarimetric information or the availability of finer resolution polarimetric SAR imagery can reduce this bias, although at the expense of area coverage and hardware complexity [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, it must be stressed that in case of long-term analysis of coastal erosion/accretion processes, the shift experienced by the shoreline extracted from SAR imagery represents a bias that may affect the whole time series in the same way, without affecting the analysis of global trends. Anyway, it was shown that the exploitation of quad-polarimetric information or the availability of finer resolution polarimetric SAR imagery can reduce this bias, although at the expense of area coverage and hardware complexity [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above-mentioned methodology was tested on a large dataset that include C-and X-band coherent and incoherent dual-polarimetric SAR imagery collected under different conditions (AOI, coastal morphology, sea state, etc.) and validated against actual GPS measurements [5,48]. At C-band, over challenging scenarios (i.e., sandy beaches and low-backscattering sea surface areas), the adopted methodology was shown to be accurate (a mean ± standard deviation distance of 4.6 ± 3.3 pixels between the extracted shoreline and GPS measurements is achieved) and time-effective (a few seconds to process a whole SAR image) [5].…”
Section: Sar Observationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the contrary, the overall SAM value in CIE-Lab composition is better than the CIE-RGB compared to the Green-Blue and Red-Green-Blue scatter results. To exploit the potential of the proposed scheme, it is worth applying the scheme to land use/cover classifications from PolSAR imagery [24,25]. As a last example, we used L-band PiSAR data [26] acquired over a calibration site with various corner reflectors deployed at Tottori Dune, Japan on 4 October 2000.…”
Section: Application Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], [9], the accuracy of the extracted coastline is discussed against the SAR frequency, showing that higher frequencies (C and X bands) perform best. The coastline extracted using multi-polarimetric SAR imagery is contrasted with ground-based information obtained using Global Positioning Sample (GPS) in [10], [11]. The extraction accuracy is lower than 4 pixels in [10] when X-band dualpolarimetric Ping Pong (HH+VV) COSMO-SkyMed SAR imagery collected in the muddy sand intertidal flat area of Lingang New City, China are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average accuracy is up to 4.6 pixels in [12] when multi-polarization C-and X-band SAR imagery collected over Monasterace, Italy, are used. The accuracy is up to 4 pixels in [11] when full-polarimetric Cband RadarSAT-2 SAR imagery collected over sandy beaches in Italy are processed. All the above-mentioned studies rely on the use of SAR imagery where the speckle was filtered using conventional local approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%