1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(98)00068-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-scale dynamic testing of a steel frame building during construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon was later attributed mainly to soil-structure interaction (Trifunac et al, 2001a;Trifunac et al, 2001b). Other studies explored the changes in system parameters before and after retrofit (Çelebi and Liu, 1998), during construction (Memari et al, 1999;Ventura and Schuster, 1996), due to non-structural elements (Pan et al, 2006), and due to water level in a dam reservoir (Proulx et al, 2001). …”
Section: Ambient Vibration Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon was later attributed mainly to soil-structure interaction (Trifunac et al, 2001a;Trifunac et al, 2001b). Other studies explored the changes in system parameters before and after retrofit (Çelebi and Liu, 1998), during construction (Memari et al, 1999;Ventura and Schuster, 1996), due to non-structural elements (Pan et al, 2006), and due to water level in a dam reservoir (Proulx et al, 2001). …”
Section: Ambient Vibration Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCHUSTER et al [2] studied the dynamic behavior of a 32-storey high-rise building during construction based on its ambient vibration in 1994. MEMARI et al [3] tested the dynamic behavior of a steel frame building during construction based on both ambient and simple harmonic forced vibration to analyze the effect of autoclaved cellular concrete block filler walls on the dynamic behavior in 1999. The analogous work on timber framed building was carried out by ELLIS and BOUGARD in 2001 [4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The resistance to deformation and fracture under dynamic loading is generally lower than under quasistatic loading, which can fatally affect the overall fracture toughness of structural materials. Thus, detailed studies employing effective and quantitative evaluation should be made to determine how to maintain the deformation and fracture resistance of the materials so that they can be widely applied to various industrial fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%