2006
DOI: 10.2175/193864706783775883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full Scale Evaluation of Upflow™ Filter – A Catch Basin Insert for the Treatment of Stormwater at Critical Source Areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should result in >90% of the typical annual flow being treated (bypass <10%). This flow performance was confirmed during previous research at the 0.9 acre (0.36 ha) Bama Belle test site (Khambhammettu et al 2006). Figures 1 and 2 are respectively a schematic and a cross section of the Up-Flo filter.…”
Section: Overview Of the Up-flo Filtersupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This should result in >90% of the typical annual flow being treated (bypass <10%). This flow performance was confirmed during previous research at the 0.9 acre (0.36 ha) Bama Belle test site (Khambhammettu et al 2006). Figures 1 and 2 are respectively a schematic and a cross section of the Up-Flo filter.…”
Section: Overview Of the Up-flo Filtersupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The field performance of the Up-Flo filter under different conditions and scales has been examined by several researchers (Pitt and Khambhammettu 2006;Togawa 2011). They have found that the Up-Flo filter has excellent removal rates for solids under a wide range of precipitation conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%