The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition 2023
DOI: 10.1017/9781108957823.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full Transfer Potential in L3/Ln Acquisition

Abstract: and Young-Scholten (1996) find that learners transfer the L1 word order within the VP; i.e. Spanish and Italian learners transfer VO, while Korean and Turkish learners transfer OV, the latter thus being immediately target-consistent in their L2. In contrast, all learners start out with the same (UG default) word order in functional projections (IP and CP), and the authors argue that, while L1 lexical categories are part of the L2 initial state, functional categories develop as a result of interaction between U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subtractive language group design (Westergaard et al 2023) was employed, with an experimental group consisting of 33 L1 Polish, L2, English and L3 Norwegian listeners and two control groups: 35 bilingual L1 Polish and L2 English listeners naïve with respect to Norwegian and 13 native Norwegian listeners with L2 English (all classroom setting learners). In an oddity categorial discrimination task 180 triads contained both Norwegian retroflexes (i.e., /ʈ ɖ ʂ ɭ ɳ/) and non-retroflexes (i.e., /t d s l n/) in inter-vocalic position.…”
Section: Parallel Sessions Multilingual Perception Of Retroflexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subtractive language group design (Westergaard et al 2023) was employed, with an experimental group consisting of 33 L1 Polish, L2, English and L3 Norwegian listeners and two control groups: 35 bilingual L1 Polish and L2 English listeners naïve with respect to Norwegian and 13 native Norwegian listeners with L2 English (all classroom setting learners). In an oddity categorial discrimination task 180 triads contained both Norwegian retroflexes (i.e., /ʈ ɖ ʂ ɭ ɳ/) and non-retroflexes (i.e., /t d s l n/) in inter-vocalic position.…”
Section: Parallel Sessions Multilingual Perception Of Retroflexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilitative influence is driven by structural similarity, while non-facilitative influence takes place when learners misanalyse L3 input and erroneously assume that a given property is common for L3 and either or both previously acquired languages. The LPM allows for the so-called ‘hybrid transfer’, that refers to the combined influence on the same property from both L1 and L2 (see also Westergaard et al, submitted).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%