2015
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1042203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full versus quasi MLE for ARMA-GARCH models with infinitely divisible innovations

Abstract: We compare the backtesting performance of ARMA-GARCH models with the most common types of infinitely divisible innovations, fit with both full maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and quasi maximum likelihood estimation (QMLE). The innovation types considered are the Gaussian, Student's t, α-stable, classical tempered stable (CTS), normal tempered stable (NTS) and generalized hyperbolic (GH) distributions. In calm periods of decreasing volatility, MLE and QMLE produce near identical performance in forecasting v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This step is performed through the garchFit function of the package fGarch of R. While for the multivariate models we consider a normal distributional assumption to extract the innovations, for the copula model we directly consider the skew-t distributional assumption. The former approach can be viewed as a quasi maximum-likelihood-estimation (QMLE) approach (see Goode et al (2015)). Additionally, at each estimation step we verify if the autoregressive component is statistically significant: if it is not, we estimate the model without the autoregressive component.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This step is performed through the garchFit function of the package fGarch of R. While for the multivariate models we consider a normal distributional assumption to extract the innovations, for the copula model we directly consider the skew-t distributional assumption. The former approach can be viewed as a quasi maximum-likelihood-estimation (QMLE) approach (see Goode et al (2015)). Additionally, at each estimation step we verify if the autoregressive component is statistically significant: if it is not, we estimate the model without the autoregressive component.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the methodology of this work follows the footsteps of the discussions of [24], but somewhat different since neither no closed forms for VaR and CVaR under EVD is given nor a direct application on the GARCH process is given in Reference [24] for forecasting the risk on the tickers considered in this paper. For more, an interested reader may refer to Reference [25].…”
Section: Motivation and Article's Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financial risk measurement and portfolio reversion closely rely on the modeling of underlying asset dynamics (Kim et al, 2011;Goode et al, 2015). Abundant evidence has contradicted the normal distribution assumption in returns distribution which exhibits leptokurtosis, asymmetry and volatility clustering phenomena, leading to stochastic jumps in stock prices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%