2011
DOI: 10.21236/ada551781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-wave Characterization of Rough Terrain Surface Effects for Forward-looking Radar Applications: A Scattering and Imaging Study from the Electromagnetic Perspective

Abstract: Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, ARLApproved for public release; distribution unlimited. ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging represents a major application for our research group at ARL. Many of our numeric radar scattering modeling results have been used as input data in SAR imaging studies (5)(6)(7). In this section, we emphasize the differences between near-and farfield SAR image formation algorithms and the requirement to produce radar modeling data consistent with the geometry of the imaging system.…”
Section: Near-field Versus Far-field In Radar Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging represents a major application for our research group at ARL. Many of our numeric radar scattering modeling results have been used as input data in SAR imaging studies (5)(6)(7). In this section, we emphasize the differences between near-and farfield SAR image formation algorithms and the requirement to produce radar modeling data consistent with the geometry of the imaging system.…”
Section: Near-field Versus Far-field In Radar Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%