2016
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully automated liver segmentation using Sobolev gradient‐based level set evolution

Abstract: Quantitative analysis and precise measurements on the liver have vital importance for pre-evaluation of surgical operations and require high accuracy in liver segmentation from all slices in a data set. However, automated liver segmentation from medical image data sets is more challenging than segmentation of any other organ due to various reasons such as vascular structures in the liver, high variability of liver shapes, similar intensity values, and unclear edges between liver and its adjacent organs. In thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For CT, state-of-the-art algorithms typically have shown good performance, with mean Dice scores of 0.93-0.95 (13)(14)(15). For MRI, a wide performance range has been reported, with mean Dice scores ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 depending on the specific MR technique and contrast material used (9,(16)(17)(18)(19)34,35). In this work, we explored the feasibility of a single multimodal CNN to perform this task with comparable accuracy across different imaging modalities and techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CT, state-of-the-art algorithms typically have shown good performance, with mean Dice scores of 0.93-0.95 (13)(14)(15). For MRI, a wide performance range has been reported, with mean Dice scores ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 depending on the specific MR technique and contrast material used (9,(16)(17)(18)(19)34,35). In this work, we explored the feasibility of a single multimodal CNN to perform this task with comparable accuracy across different imaging modalities and techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This level set approach has fast computational time (a large advantage for this application), robustness to image noise and missing edges (commonly encountered in MRI), and flexibility by modifying or choosing just a few parameters. Broadly, due to these desirable properties, level sets have been demonstrated as being superior compared to other methods for segmenting various tissues on MR images such as brain tumors as well as whole organs such as the liver [12, 13, 33, 35]. The level set is described by…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…82,83 (Sobolev gradient computations are not given here to avoid making the length of the paper too long because of unnecessary information. The readers can see [81][82][83] for details). Algorithm #1 presents the proposed optimization that is called as Sobolev gradient-based Accelerated Stochastic Gradient Descent (SASGradD).…”
Section: Optimization In the 3d Cnnmentioning
confidence: 99%