2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully automated precise operational modal identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It is safer to over-specify the model order to make sure that all physical modes are extracted. However, this also leads to the inclusion of mathematical (spurious) modes in the final set of identified parameters [8,76]. Automatic modal parameter identification studies are carried out to separate the mathematical (spurious) modes from the physical ones, thereby clearing the stabilization diagram [16,77].…”
Section: Validation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is safer to over-specify the model order to make sure that all physical modes are extracted. However, this also leads to the inclusion of mathematical (spurious) modes in the final set of identified parameters [8,76]. Automatic modal parameter identification studies are carried out to separate the mathematical (spurious) modes from the physical ones, thereby clearing the stabilization diagram [16,77].…”
Section: Validation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [76], the criteria for the separation of poles in stabilization diagrams can be divided into hard criteria, soft criteria, and modal uncertainty. The hard validation criteria give strict numerical values that the identified entities must satisfy.…”
Section: Validation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 Very recently, Cheema et al 18 applied a Dirichlet process Gaussian mixture model (DP-GMM) clustering approach to discern true physical modes from the mathematically spurious modes on a cable-stayed bridge in New South Wales, Australia. He et al 19 applied a modified version of fuzzy C-means (FCM) clustering to the Fourth Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge. Zeng and Hoon Kim 20 tested a self-adaptive clustering approach with a weighted multi-term distance on the Z24 and Downing Hall benchmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 He et al proposed a modified fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm with an iterative graph partitioning method, which can be used to identify the closely spaced modes. 25 Mao et al applied the principal component analysis to the automated identification to reduce the noise components and proposed a flexible method to determine the cutoff numbers for the hierarchical clustering. 26 Zeng et al defined a novel distance with the uncertainty of modal parameters and proposed an improved self-adaptive clustering based on the weighted distance, which effectively enhanced the robustness of the identification process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%