1999
DOI: 10.1007/10704282_72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully Automatic 3D/2D Subtracted Angiography Registration

Abstract: Abstract. Today, 3-D angiography volumes are routinely generated from rotational angiography sequences. In previous work [7], we have studied the precision reached by registering such volumes with classical 2-D angiography images, inferring this matching only from the sensors of the angiography machine. The error led by such a registration can be described as a 3-D rigid motion composed of a large translation and a small rotation. This paper describes the strategy we followed to correct this error. The angiogr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These method differ with respect to the method of rendering simulated 2D projection images and with respect to the SM, which measures the degree of matching between real and simulated images. In this paper, the simulated 2D projection images were rendered using maximum intensity projection (MIP), 8 while either mutual information 9,24 (MI) and gradient correlation 9,25 (GC) were used as the SM; these two methods will be referred to as MIP-MI and MIP-GC, respectively. The third method is the 3D-2D back-projection gradient-based method (BGB) proposed by Tomaževič et al 18 , which is based on matching the 3D gradient vectors representing 3D surface normals and 2D-to-3D back-projected gradient vectors.…”
Section: State-of-the-art 3d-2d Registration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These method differ with respect to the method of rendering simulated 2D projection images and with respect to the SM, which measures the degree of matching between real and simulated images. In this paper, the simulated 2D projection images were rendered using maximum intensity projection (MIP), 8 while either mutual information 9,24 (MI) and gradient correlation 9,25 (GC) were used as the SM; these two methods will be referred to as MIP-MI and MIP-GC, respectively. The third method is the 3D-2D back-projection gradient-based method (BGB) proposed by Tomaževič et al 18 , which is based on matching the 3D gradient vectors representing 3D surface normals and 2D-to-3D back-projected gradient vectors.…”
Section: State-of-the-art 3d-2d Registration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we hypothesize that by searching simultaneously for rigid-body and the C-arm's pose parameters we can improve the accuracy and success rate of the 3D-2D registration methods. Similar studies have already been performed, 8,21 however those studies lack a thorough and objective and evaluation, since only a limited number of 3D-2D registration methods were tested and only five or less clinical image datasets were used were used for evaluation. Here, we tested three state-of-the-art 3D-2D registration methods and performed quantitative and qualitative evaluation on twenty clinical image datasets containing different cerebrovascular pathologies.…”
Section: Pa Ssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use the intensity-based 2-D/3-D registration method that iteratively maximizes the similarity measure between the DRR [4] and the Digitally Subtracted Angiography (DSA) [5]. The intensity-based method is shown to be very accurate for aorta/vessel registration [2].…”
Section: Automatic Compensation For Patient Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Registration of an X-ray computed tomography (CT) image to one or more X-ray projection images (e.g. simulator images, portal images, fluoroscopy images, amorphous silicon detector images) is a particularly interesting example of 2D-3D registration that has a number of possible applications, including patient placement for radiotherapy planning and treatment verification [1,4], radiosurgery [13], cranial neurosurgery [9], neurointerventions [6,7], spinal surgery [8,21], orthopedic surgery [5], and aortic stenting procedures [2,14,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%