2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10470-6_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully Automatic Bone Age Estimation from Left Hand MR Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our group has previously contributed to the development of automated age estimation methods from hand and wrist MRI. In [33] and [34], we have shown a method based on random forests [35], which performs nonlinear regression after dedicated anatomical landmark localization [36] of age-relevant bone structures. Later, we improved performance of the age regression component by training a deep CNN (DCNN) for age estimation in [37].…”
Section: Automatic Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group has previously contributed to the development of automated age estimation methods from hand and wrist MRI. In [33] and [34], we have shown a method based on random forests [35], which performs nonlinear regression after dedicated anatomical landmark localization [36] of age-relevant bone structures. Later, we improved performance of the age regression component by training a deep CNN (DCNN) for age estimation in [37].…”
Section: Automatic Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar studies in the field of automated age estimation are the works by Stern et al [21,27,28,59,60] and Dallora et al [30]. Both research groups have developed and analyzed methods for age estimation based on machine learning (incl.…”
Section: Comparison To Similar Studiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As a proof of concept, the segmentations were used for the age estimation of a number of subjects. First results show the potential of this approach attaining a mean difference of 0.48 ± 0.32 years, which improve results from Stern et al of 0.85 ± 0.58 years [2]. In order to fully exploit the potential of neural networks and to supply a more precise and reliable age prediction, the approach has to be tested on a larger data collective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%