1979
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-41692-6.50014-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fumigation Against Fungi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other p~sitive nontarget effects of fumi~atiOn are we~d and msect control. Negative effects, like plant stuntmg, have been attributed to bromide toxicity (Vanachter, 1979). Plant stunting also has been attri~ute~ in recent years to P deficiency caused by eradicatiOn of mycorrhizal fungi with MB treatment (Maronek et al, 1981 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other p~sitive nontarget effects of fumi~atiOn are we~d and msect control. Negative effects, like plant stuntmg, have been attributed to bromide toxicity (Vanachter, 1979). Plant stunting also has been attri~ute~ in recent years to P deficiency caused by eradicatiOn of mycorrhizal fungi with MB treatment (Maronek et al, 1981 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 50 years, methyl bromide was widely used as a soil fumigant due to its low cost, ease of handling, performance under a wide range of soil and environmental conditions, low phytotoxicity, and broad range of activity. Globally, it was viewed as indispensable wherever intensive agriculture was practiced (Vanachter, 1975), and in the US a 1990s economic study estimated that a ban on the use of methyl bromide would cost producers and consumers more than US$1 billion annually (Anonymous, 1993).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%