46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2008
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fun3D / OptiGRID Coupling for Unstructured Grid Adaptation for Sonic Boom Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the prediction accuracy of CFD approach, many efforts have been made to near field grid adaptation. [15][16][17][18][19] The influence of viscous effects, turbulence models and higher order schemes has also been investigated. 20,21 In this paper, four benchmark cases including two axisymmetric body, a simple delta wing body and a full configuration includes fuselage, wing, tail, flow-through nacelles, and blade wing were computed with a RANS based flow solver to predicted the near field sonic boom signature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the prediction accuracy of CFD approach, many efforts have been made to near field grid adaptation. [15][16][17][18][19] The influence of viscous effects, turbulence models and higher order schemes has also been investigated. 20,21 In this paper, four benchmark cases including two axisymmetric body, a simple delta wing body and a full configuration includes fuselage, wing, tail, flow-through nacelles, and blade wing were computed with a RANS based flow solver to predicted the near field sonic boom signature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This configuration has also been used by other researchers to evaluate their signature prediction techniques. 12,15 The pressure integral output function was defined as a cylinder, six body lengths in radius, centered about the geometry axis. The cylinder is clipped forward of 3 body lengths behind the nose, aft of 9 body lengths behind the nose, and outside of 0.1 body lengths off the centerline to focus only on the region where wind tunnel data is available.…”
Section: Via Cone-cylinder Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 This alignment issue has also given rise to hybrid methods [11][12][13] where near-body unstructured grid solutions are interpolated to shock-aligned structured grid methods to increase accuracy. The hybrid methods are hindered by the interpolation process, so adaptive grid methods 14,15 are employed to improve the accuracy of unstructured grid methods for long propagation distances. These previous adaptive methods have used only primal solution information (Mach and density) to drive the adaptive process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More comparison results of CFD predictions and flight data at approximately 100 ft below the aircraft for the F-5E can be found in [9]. A detailed CFD analysis of the F-5E using FUN3D with grid adaptation is documented in [10], which includes a comparison of a FUN3D solution to the Northrop-Grumman CFD prediction of dp/p at 1.5 body lengths (or 75 ft) below the aircraft, as well as a comparison of a FUN3D solution to the flight data at 1.82 body lengths (or 91 ft) below the aircraft. Comparison of CFD predictions and flight data for the NASA F-15B with the Gulfstream's quiet spike is documented in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%