Função Mastigatória, Movimentos Mandibulares E Atividade Elétrica Do Músculo Masseter Em Crianças E Adolescentes Respiradores Oronasais

França, Fernanda Pereira; Coêlho, Julyane Feitoza; Oliveira, Waleska Gaia; Almeida, Larissa Najdara Alves; Alves, Giorvan Ânderson dos Santos

doi:10.22533/at.ed.2991915027

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The present study found a mean of 12.13 for the mandibular mobility variable in oronasal, differing from another study 25 , which also used AMOFE in oronasal, which found an average of 14.00 for the same variable.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers

Mattos

2018

Rev. CEFAC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: to compare the variables of the Orofacial Evaluation with Scores Protocol between nasal, oral and oronasal breathers. Methods: a sample consisting of three distinct groups subdivided into nasal, oral and oronasal breathers, both genders, with ages ranging from 6 to 12 years. The characteristics of the orofacial musculature were measured using the protocol. Results: there was a significant difference between oral and oronasal breathers compared to nasal ones (p=0.0007) in specific variables such as palatal conformation (p=0.0073); mobility of tongue (p: 0.0111) and lip (p=0.0451), with a significant difference between the groups evaluated, also observed for the total protocol score (p=0.0007) and posture (p: 0.0073), where the nasal respirators differ from the oral and oronasal ones, the latter being similar. As for lip (p=0.0451) and tongue (p=0.0111) mobility, the groups studied presented different results among themselves. Conclusion: when comparing the groups of oral and oronasal breathers, in relation to the variables of the AMIOFE protocol, no statistically significant difference was seen between these two groups, which allows the conclusion that the orofacial myofunctional behavior between oral and oronasal breathers in this research, was similar.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers

Mattos

2018

Rev. CEFAC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Função Mastigatória, Movimentos Mandibulares E Atividade Elétrica Do Músculo Masseter Em Crianças E Adolescentes Respiradores Oronasais

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers

Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About