2009
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.027516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Function of the sexually dimorphic ear of the American bullfrog,Rana catesbeiana: brief review and new insight

Abstract: SUMMARYThe dimorphic ear of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana, has long been enigmatic. The male's tympanic membrane (TM) area approximates twice the area of the female's; however, similar size differences in the area of the columellar footplate were not observed between the sexes. Hence, the male's hearing is expected to be more sensitive than the female's but this is not the case. Asking what offsets the advantage of the large TM, we applied a series of experiments to the auditory system. Male and female audiog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies indicate that the greater tympanic membrane area ratio (tympanic membrane to columellar footplate) of males is offset by a heavier cartilage cushion on the male's tympanic membrane, thus damping the tympanic membrane's response to sound (Werner et al 2009). Thus, the fact that females' hearing is more sensitive at relatively lower frequencies than that of males may be due to the heavier cartilage cushion on the male's tympanic membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies indicate that the greater tympanic membrane area ratio (tympanic membrane to columellar footplate) of males is offset by a heavier cartilage cushion on the male's tympanic membrane, thus damping the tympanic membrane's response to sound (Werner et al 2009). Thus, the fact that females' hearing is more sensitive at relatively lower frequencies than that of males may be due to the heavier cartilage cushion on the male's tympanic membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the fact that females' hearing is more sensitive at relatively lower frequencies than that of males may be due to the heavier cartilage cushion on the male's tympanic membrane. This point needs to be studied further using methods such as additional artificial loading of the membrane in conjunction with microphonics experiments (Werner et al 2009). Thus, intersexual differences in the shape of the tympanic membrane in Chinese tiger frogs may be closely related functionally to intersexual differences of the tympanic membrane during the course of evolution (Hetherington 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the biomechanical and electrophysiological frequency tuning with morphological properties along the crista acustica in A. fenestrata, our study provides evidence for an auditory fovea as a sex-specific adaptation that reflects the asymmetric signalling in the reciprocal acoustic communication of these duetting bushcrickets. Sexual dimorphism in hearing organs had been reported predominantly in insects [41][42][43][44][45] and anurans [46][47][48][49][50], but was also shown in geckos [51] and humans [52]. These anatomical differences often reflect sex-specific adaptations of the hearing system to improve the auditory sensitivity or selectivity for acoustic properties of conspecific mating signals or other sounds that have different behavioural relevance to males and females of the same species [23,53,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences often rely on dimorphisms in sensory processing systems, consisting of peripheral sensory organs and central neural circuits [2][3][4] . In many animals, sensory organs have diverged to tune responses to important cues for each sex [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . The importance of sexual dimorphisms in central sensory processing for sex-specific behaviours has also been reported 4,[12][13][14] , though these insights are mainly limited to specific behaviours in certain model organisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%