2016
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2015.0203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Alignment of Metabolic Networks

Abstract: Abstract. Network alignment has become a standard tool in comparative biology, allowing the inference of protein function, interaction and orthology. However, current alignment techniques are based on topological properties of networks and do not take into account their functional implications. Here we propose, for the first time, an algorithm to align two metabolic networks by taking advantage of their coupled metabolic models. These models allow us to assess the functional implications of genes or reactions,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional alignment is challenging because even phylogenetically closely-related organisms can have very different metabolic repertoires 24 , and structurally similar network parts (e.g., parallel pathways) could have too similar functions to be resolved unambiguously by sensitivity correlations. A previous method for functional network alignment 25 reported 85% correct alignments for 100% common reactions when aligning the yeast GSM iMM904 26 with itself. In contrast, more than 92% of the metabolic reactions were correctly aligned even when using only 1% of the reactions to compute sensitivity correlations (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Functional alignment is challenging because even phylogenetically closely-related organisms can have very different metabolic repertoires 24 , and structurally similar network parts (e.g., parallel pathways) could have too similar functions to be resolved unambiguously by sensitivity correlations. A previous method for functional network alignment 25 reported 85% correct alignments for 100% common reactions when aligning the yeast GSM iMM904 26 with itself. In contrast, more than 92% of the metabolic reactions were correctly aligned even when using only 1% of the reactions to compute sensitivity correlations (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green: average ± s.d. ; red: method by Mazza et al 25 b Average sensitivity correlations (Pearson, green) and Jaccard indices (pink) for model pairs as a function of divergence time. Red circles: comparisons between a subset of the Gram-positive bacteria ( B. subtilis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis) and the Gram-negative bacteria; blue circles: comparisons between yeast and bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result of this contraction, the metabolic network is converted into a simple structure, a metabolic DAG to easily visualise the network connectivity. As far as the comparison of metabolic networks or pathways goes, most tools compare two metabolic pathways by means of their networks alignment [28][29][30][31], while others define similarity measures based on their reactions similarity or the topological properties of the networks [32][33][34]. However, they do not provide a graphical visualisation of the obtained results on metabolic networks comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%