2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional analysis of the naturally recombinant DNA-A of the bipartite begomovirus Tomato chlorotic mottle virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inoculation of plants with only the TA did not lead to symptomatic infection, although the virus component could be detected distal to the inoculation site in a small number of plants. This is consistent with earlier findings which have shown that the DNA A component of bipartite begomoviruses may spread in plants, without inducing symptoms and at low DNA titer, in the absence of DNA B (Klinkenberg and Stanley, 1990 ; Evans and Jeske, 1993b ; Briddon and Markham, 2001 ; Saunders et al, 2002 ; Fontenelle et al, 2007 ). Inoculation of TA with Cβ partially complemented missing DNA B functions (more plants showing the presence of TA than in plants inoculated with TA in the absence of the betasatellite) but did not lead to symptomatic infection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inoculation of plants with only the TA did not lead to symptomatic infection, although the virus component could be detected distal to the inoculation site in a small number of plants. This is consistent with earlier findings which have shown that the DNA A component of bipartite begomoviruses may spread in plants, without inducing symptoms and at low DNA titer, in the absence of DNA B (Klinkenberg and Stanley, 1990 ; Evans and Jeske, 1993b ; Briddon and Markham, 2001 ; Saunders et al, 2002 ; Fontenelle et al, 2007 ). Inoculation of TA with Cβ partially complemented missing DNA B functions (more plants showing the presence of TA than in plants inoculated with TA in the absence of the betasatellite) but did not lead to symptomatic infection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Mutation of the AC4 gene of ToLCNDV had no effect on the infectivity or symptoms of the virus in the presence of the DNA B—all plants were infected/symptomatic. This is consistent with previous studies that mutated the AC4 gene of bipartite begomoviruses and indicates that the product of AC4 is not required for either infectivity or the induction of symptoms (Etessami et al, 1991 ; Hoogstraten et al, 1996 ; Pooma and Petty, 1996 ; Fontenelle et al, 2007 ). However, in the absence of the DNA B, the DNA A component with the AC4 mutation was significantly more infectious to N. benthamiana than the wild type.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Mutational studies have revealed that MYMIV AC5 plays a role in geminiviral DNA replication in a yeast model system (Raghavan et al, 2004), although the functional role of AC5 during infection of plant hosts has not been described. AC5-null mutants of two bipartite begomoviruses, Tomato chlorotic mottle virus (ToCMoV) and Watermelon chlorotic stunt virus (WmCSV), behave similarly to their respective wild-type viruses, suggesting that AC5 is not essential for the virus infection cycle (Kheyr-Pour et al, 2000;Fontenelle et al, 2007). However, mutation analysis of the C5 gene from three isolates of Tomato leaf deformation virus (ToLDeV), a 'New World' monopartite begomovirus, has shown a contrasting effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of the AC4 ORF of bipartite begomoviruses showed that this gene has no significant effect on infectivity [53]. In Brazil, ToCMoV AC4 is neither involved in symptom development nor in systemic movement of viral DNA-A [54]. Interesting results regarding gene function may be obtained if ToYVSV-[G22]-like viruses are fully characterized and compared with ToYVSV- [Ba3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%