2021
DOI: 10.1007/7854_2020_203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Brain Imaging and OCD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost all previous studies using neuroimaging data subtyped patients with mental disorders based on one MRI modality (Chand et al, 2020 ; Drysdale et al, 2017 ; Sundermann et al, 2014 ; Varol et al, 2017 ). These studies ignored the multimodal nature in mental disorders like OCD (Soriano‐Mas, 2021 ; Veltman, 2021 ). To our knowledge, it was the first attempt using multimodal MRI data to uncover putative subtypes of OCD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Almost all previous studies using neuroimaging data subtyped patients with mental disorders based on one MRI modality (Chand et al, 2020 ; Drysdale et al, 2017 ; Sundermann et al, 2014 ; Varol et al, 2017 ). These studies ignored the multimodal nature in mental disorders like OCD (Soriano‐Mas, 2021 ; Veltman, 2021 ). To our knowledge, it was the first attempt using multimodal MRI data to uncover putative subtypes of OCD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental disorders are accompanied by structural and functional aberrance reflecting different sides of pathological features. In OCD, beyond structural aberrance, patients with OCD demonstrate functional abnormalities in regional activity and interregional functional coordination (Soriano‐Mas, 2021 ; Stein et al, 2019 ; Veltman, 2021 ). In addition, brain structure and function differences are not independent of each other and neither of them can delineate the complete picture of the pathomechanism of mental disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What insights in OCD have we gained from functional connectivity studies? In the past 20 years, task-positive and resting-state functional connectivity studies have expanded our understanding of brain circuit abnormalities in OCD ( 59 ). Chiefly, our understanding of dysfunctional cortical, striatal, and thalamic (CSTC) circuits and resting-state networks [i.e., default-mode network (DMN) circuits] has been greatly expanded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chiefly, our understanding of dysfunctional cortical, striatal, and thalamic (CSTC) circuits and resting-state networks [i.e., default-mode network (DMN) circuits] has been greatly expanded. Task-based fMRI studies have revealed abnormal patterns of hypo- and hyper-activation in domains such as executive functioning, emotional processing, and symptom provocation ( 59 ) with commonly implicated brain regions including: the prefrontal cortex (PFC) ( 54 , 60 ), BG and thalamus ( 61 ), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) ( 62 ), dACC ( 63 ), amygdala ( 64 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuit including cortical areas, striatum, and thalamus has been a considerable model involving the neural basis of OCD over the years [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. According to recent reviews, five parallel and segregated neural networks are related to different clinical characteristics of OCD: the fronto-limbic, dorsal cognitive, ventral cognitive, ventral affective, and sensorimotor networks [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%