2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13081886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Characteristics and Mechanical Performance of PCU Composites for Knee Meniscus Replacement

Abstract: The potential use of fiber-reinforced based polycarbonate-urethanes (PCUs) as candidate meniscal substitutes was investigated in this study. Mechanical test pieces were designed and fabricated using a compression molding technique. Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers were impregnated into PCU matrices, and their mechanical and microstructural properties evaluated. In particular, the tensile moduli of the PCUs were found unsuitable, since they were comparatively lower than that of the menis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, compressive modulus of PCL 0.2 constructs was 5.65 MPa (Figure 1E) and higher than that of native human meniscus (0.1-1.13 MPa). 31 Regarding mechanical properties, it should be underlined that, measured compressive modulus is not comparable with native meniscus. Definitely, common compression stress-relaxation test, used for gaining a sense of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed scaffolds, is not representative of the dynamic mechanical environment of natural menisci.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, compressive modulus of PCL 0.2 constructs was 5.65 MPa (Figure 1E) and higher than that of native human meniscus (0.1-1.13 MPa). 31 Regarding mechanical properties, it should be underlined that, measured compressive modulus is not comparable with native meniscus. Definitely, common compression stress-relaxation test, used for gaining a sense of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed scaffolds, is not representative of the dynamic mechanical environment of natural menisci.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCU) are more durable, with good mechanical properties, hydrolytic resistance, and low friction properties. 165 , 166 Zhu et al, 167 , 168 focused on design and biomechanical characterization of PCU-based porous meniscal structures fabricated using triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS). Precise control over structure configuration seems to be beneficial to adjust mechanical stiffness of the meniscal implant.…”
Section: Synthetic and Natural Materials For Meniscal Scaffolds Printing Conditioning And Bioprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still much work to be done in the identification of polymer blends that accurately mimic the mechanical properties and biomechanics of natural cartilage, as well as blends that provide high load-bearing and wear-resistant capabilities. As menisci are responsible for stabilizing joints and acting as shock absorbers, mechanical properties remain one of the most important characteristics to consider when designing appropriate implants for meniscal repairs (Inyang and Vaughan, 2020). This is also of particular concern for IVDs, which differ in anatomy and function by location in the spinal column.…”
Section: Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%