2007
DOI: 10.1021/jm070532r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Characterization of Tet-AMPA [Tetrazolyl-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl- 4-isoxazolyl)propionic Acid] Analogues at Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors GluR1−GluR4. The Molecular Basis for the Functional Selectivity Profile of 2-Bn-Tet-AMPA

Abstract: Four 2-substituted Tet-AMPA [Tet = tetrazolyl, AMPA = 2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid] analogues were characterized functionally at the homomeric AMPA receptors GluR1i, GluR2Qi, GluR3i, and GluR4i in a Fluo-4/Ca2+ assay. Whereas 2-Et-Tet-AMPA, 2-Pr-Tet-AMPA, and 2-iPr-Tet-AMPA were nonselective GluR agonists, 2-Bn-Tet-AMPA exhibited a 40-fold higher potency at GluR4i than at GluR1i. Examination of homology models of the S1-S2 domains of GluR1 and GluR4 containing 2-Bn-Tet-AMPA suggest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Agonists such as 6-aza substituted willardiine derivatives display an increased potency for GluR4 receptors (52, 53), and others like 2-Bn-Tet-AMPA exhibit a 40-fold increased potency at GluR4 receptors compared to GluR1/2 receptors (54). An examination of the ligand-binding sub-pockets in the vicinity of the functional groups that are changed did not show any obvious stereochemical differences between GluR4 and GluR2 structures that would account for these results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agonists such as 6-aza substituted willardiine derivatives display an increased potency for GluR4 receptors (52, 53), and others like 2-Bn-Tet-AMPA exhibit a 40-fold increased potency at GluR4 receptors compared to GluR1/2 receptors (54). An examination of the ligand-binding sub-pockets in the vicinity of the functional groups that are changed did not show any obvious stereochemical differences between GluR4 and GluR2 structures that would account for these results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cl-HIBO activates GluA1 and GluA2 with 275-to 1600-fold selectivity over GluA3 or GluA4, respectively. The agonist 2-benzyl-tetrazol-AMPA shows 40-fold selectivity for GluA4 over GluA1 (Jensen et al, 2007). Crystal structures of 2-benzyl-tetrazol-AMPA bound to the GluA2 LBD reveal that the benzyl group occupies a novel cavity opened up by movement of Met708 in GluA2, and the selectivity of 2-benzyl-tetrazol-AMPA is due to residues adjacent to this cavity (Val690 and Ala691), which are conserved in GluA2 to GluA4 but correspond to Met686 and Ile687 in GluA1 (Vogensen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Schiffer Et Al (1997)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMPA receptor agonists with preferences for GluA1/2 versus GluA3/4 and GluA1/2/3 versus GluA4, respectively. [7][8][9] 8-Me-4-AHCP (7) is a highly selective GluK1 agonist [10] (Scheme 2). X-ray crystallographic and mutational studies have disclosed that the selectivity of these ligands arises from interactions with different non-conserved parts of the receptorbinding pocket.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%