2016
DOI: 10.3390/econometrics4010006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional-Coefficient Spatial Durbin Models with Nonparametric Spatial Weights: An Application to Economic Growth

Abstract: This paper considers a functional-coefficient spatial Durbin model with nonparametric spatial weights. Applying the series approximation method, we estimate the unknown functional coefficients and spatial weighting functions via a nonparametric two-stage least squares (or 2SLS) estimation method. To further improve estimation accuracy, we also construct a second-step estimator of the unknown functional coefficients by a local linear regression approach. Some Monte Carlo simulation results are reported to asses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are alternative approaches to the MARS algorithm that allow spatial heterogeneity in spatial econometric models, such as the mixture model (Cornwall & Parent, 2017), quantile regression (Seya et al, 2020), functional‐coefficient models (Koroglu & Sun, 2016), the penalized spline combined with spatial error model (Łaszkiewicz et al, 2022), and SAR‐(M)GWR (Geniaux & Martinetti, 2018). Each of these approaches has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of method will depend on the specific research question and the characteristics of the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are alternative approaches to the MARS algorithm that allow spatial heterogeneity in spatial econometric models, such as the mixture model (Cornwall & Parent, 2017), quantile regression (Seya et al, 2020), functional‐coefficient models (Koroglu & Sun, 2016), the penalized spline combined with spatial error model (Łaszkiewicz et al, 2022), and SAR‐(M)GWR (Geniaux & Martinetti, 2018). Each of these approaches has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of method will depend on the specific research question and the characteristics of the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 This method has been extensively applied in the estimation of the spatial panel model (see, for instance, Bao and Ullah (2007); Elhorst and Fréret (2009); Koroglu and Sun (2016); Lee (2004); Lee and Yu (2016); Ord (1975)). known to overcome the problem of the imprecise and inappropriate coefficients produced by the OLS method while estimating the (dynamic) spatial panel model (see, for instance, Anselin, 1988;Anselin and Hudak, 1992;Elhorst, 2003;Lee, 2004;Yu et al, 2008, among others).…”
Section: Endogeneity Concerns and Estimation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of [5] , Su [6] proposes a semi-parametric spatial autoregressive model with heteroscedasticity and spatial correlation of error terms, and obtains the semi-parametric GMM estimation through the two-step estimation method. For more literature, see Zhang [7] , Sun [8] , Koroglu and Sun [9] , etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%