2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional correspondence by matrix completion

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the problem of finding dense intrinsic correspondence between manifolds using the recently introduced functional framework. We pose the functional correspondence problem as matrix completion with manifold geometric structure and inducing functional localization with the L1 norm. We discuss efficient numerical procedures for the solution of our problem. Our method compares favorably to the accuracy of state-of-the-art correspondence algorithms on non-rigid shape matching benchmarks, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By choosing the Laplacian eigenfunctions on scriptX and scriptY as the bases {φiscriptX} and {φjscriptY}, one can truncate the series to the first k terms—hence obtaining a compact representation which can be interpreted as a band‐limited approximation of the full map. Correspondence problems can then be phrased as searching for a k×k matrix boldC minimizing simple data fidelity criteria [OBCS*12, NO17] or exhibiting a particular structure depending on the correspondence setting [PBB*13, KBBV15, RCB*17].…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By choosing the Laplacian eigenfunctions on scriptX and scriptY as the bases {φiscriptX} and {φjscriptY}, one can truncate the series to the first k terms—hence obtaining a compact representation which can be interpreted as a band‐limited approximation of the full map. Correspondence problems can then be phrased as searching for a k×k matrix boldC minimizing simple data fidelity criteria [OBCS*12, NO17] or exhibiting a particular structure depending on the correspondence setting [PBB*13, KBBV15, RCB*17].…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key innovations of this framework is allowing bringing a new set of algebraic methods into the domain of shape correspondence. Several follow‐up works tried to improve the framework by employing sparsity‐based priors [PBB*13], manifold optimization [KBB*13, KGB16], non‐orthogonal [KBBV15] or localized [CSBK17, MRCB18] bases, coupled optimization over the forward and inverse maps [ERGB16, EBC17, HO17], combination of functional maps with metric‐based approaches [ADK16, SK17] and kernelization [WGBS18]. Recent works of [NO17, NMR*18] considered functional algebra (function point‐wise multiplications together with addition).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensions of the functional map framework have been proposed by several authors, covering the problem of non‐isometric deformations [PBB*13, KBB*13, RBW*14, KBBV15], partial similarity [RCB*16, LRB*16], clutter [CRM*16], shape exploration [ROA*13, HWG14] and image segmentation [WHG13] among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%