2017
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.13309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localized Manifold Harmonics for Spectral Shape Analysis

Abstract: The use of Laplacian eigenfunctions is ubiquitous in a wide range of computer graphics and geometry processing applications. In particular, Laplacian eigenbases allow generalizing the classical Fourier analysis to manifolds. A key drawback of such bases is their inherently global nature, as the Laplacian eigenfunctions carry geometric and topological structure of the entire manifold. In this paper, we introduce a new framework for local spectral shape analysis. We show how to efficiently construct localized or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A better alternative is the use of localized manifold harmonics [CSBK17, MRCB18]. Assume that we are given a rough indication of the support of μ (for example, coming from a shape matching algorithm) in the form of a step potential function Vfalse(x,yfalse)=leftνleftμfalse(x,yfalse)0;left0left otherwise .where ν1.…”
Section: Spectral Map Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A better alternative is the use of localized manifold harmonics [CSBK17, MRCB18]. Assume that we are given a rough indication of the support of μ (for example, coming from a shape matching algorithm) in the form of a step potential function Vfalse(x,yfalse)=leftνleftμfalse(x,yfalse)0;left0left otherwise .where ν1.…”
Section: Spectral Map Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key innovations of this framework is allowing bringing a new set of algebraic methods into the domain of shape correspondence. Several follow‐up works tried to improve the framework by employing sparsity‐based priors [PBB*13], manifold optimization [KBB*13, KGB16], non‐orthogonal [KBBV15] or localized [CSBK17, MRCB18] bases, coupled optimization over the forward and inverse maps [ERGB16, EBC17, HO17], combination of functional maps with metric‐based approaches [ADK16, SK17] and kernelization [WGBS18]. Recent works of [NO17, NMR*18] considered functional algebra (function point‐wise multiplications together with addition).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Schrödinger operator augments the Laplacian with a potential, which can be specifically designed for the different applications. A related construction is introduced by Melzi et al [MRCB18]. Though we focus the presentation on the Laplace‐Beltrami operator, our our approach can be used for fast approximations of the spectra and eigen‐functions for these operators as well.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Compute a small set of k 1 << n 1 and k 2 << n 2 basis functions on each shape. The most common choice consists in using the first k eigenfunctions of the Laplace‐Beltrami operator of each shape, although other bases derived from the Hamiltonian operator [CSBK18] and more localized basis functions [NVT*14, MRCB18] have also been used. Compute a set of descriptor functions on each shape, that are expected to be approximately preserved by the unknown map. Store their coefficients in the corresponding bases as columns of matrices A 1 , A 2 . Compute the optimal functional map C by solving the following optimization problem: where the first term aims at the descriptor preservation: E desc ( C 12 ) = || C 12 A 1 – A 2 || 2 , whereas the second term regularizes the map by promoting the correctness of its overall structural properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%