2003
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00844.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Coupling of Motor Units Is Modulated During Walking in Human Subjects

Abstract: Time- and frequency-domain analysis of the coupling between pairs of electromyograms (EMG) recorded from leg muscles was investigated during walking in healthy human subjects. For two independent surface EMG signals from the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, coupling estimated from coherence measurements was observed at frequencies Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
118
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
17
118
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of high-frequency coherence in moderately strong subjects fits with previous studies demonstrating that EEG/EMG coherence, which can be disrupted by TMS to the motor cortex (Hasan and Nielsen 2004), occurs at this higher-frequency band (Brown and Marsden 2001). In contrast, noninjured control subjects exhibited little to no high-frequency coherence between antagonist muscles during walking as reported previously (Halliday et al 2003;Hansen et al 2001). The lack of coherence between antagonist muscles in noninjured controls does not necessarily indicate that there is little to no descending drive to muscles of the leg during intact walking.…”
Section: Coherence In Noninjured Controlssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of high-frequency coherence in moderately strong subjects fits with previous studies demonstrating that EEG/EMG coherence, which can be disrupted by TMS to the motor cortex (Hasan and Nielsen 2004), occurs at this higher-frequency band (Brown and Marsden 2001). In contrast, noninjured control subjects exhibited little to no high-frequency coherence between antagonist muscles during walking as reported previously (Halliday et al 2003;Hansen et al 2001). The lack of coherence between antagonist muscles in noninjured controls does not necessarily indicate that there is little to no descending drive to muscles of the leg during intact walking.…”
Section: Coherence In Noninjured Controlssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Rather, it is likely that during intact walking there is very little common descending drive to antagonist muscle pairs. Leg muscles appear to be activated rather independently during intact walking because higher-frequency coherence is only present between different motor units of a given muscle or between synergistic muscles (Halliday et al 2003;Hansen et al 2001). However, results from this study show that after chronic and incomplete spinal cord injury, the strength of common descending connections to antagonist muscle pairs appears to be increased to generate functional but not necessarily "normal," walking.…”
Section: Coherence In Noninjured Controlsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The stick insect, mouse, and cat data differed markedly from the human and horse data, with the smaller animals having swing motor neuron activity that continued throughout swing and the larger ones having swing activity only at swing beginning. Swing motor neuron activity also continues throughout the entirety of swing in guineafowl (Gatesy, 1999), chick (Jacobson and Hollyday, 1982), and newt (Székely et al, 1969) legs and small (ankle) limb segments in humans (Prochazka et al, 1989;Halliday et al, 2003;Cappellini et al, 2006).…”
Section: Comparison Of C Morosus Data To Those From Other Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plots were classified as 1) a broad positive peak around zero, indicating tremor burst activity that was more in-phase and synchronous, 2) a broad negative peak around zero, indicating tremor burst activity that was more out-of-phase and alternating, and 3) a narrow central peak close to zero, indicating short-term synchronization with tremor bursts consistent with a common presynaptic drive (Sears and Stagg 1976;Hansen et al 2001;Halliday et al 2003)see figure 2 for typical examples). We chose cumulant density In some data sets, cumulant analysis did not reveal any significant correlation structure between EMG bursts.…”
Section: Coherence and Cumulant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%