2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107717
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Divergence of the Arabidopsis Florigen-Interacting bZIP Transcription Factors FD and FDP

Abstract: Highlights d FDP is expressed at the shoot apex in a largely discrete pattern to FD d Flowering genes are bound only by FD, whereas other targets are bound by FD and FDP d FD and FDP bind to and regulate genes involved in ABA responses in seedlings d FT overexpressed in the phloem promotes flowering independently of FD and FDP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 14 ] FDP has a complementary expression pattern with FD in the SAM during floral transition. [ 171,172 ] Although fdp‐1 and fdp‐2 , the point mutations in the DNA‐binding domain of FDP, cause a slightly late‐flowering phenotype and could enhance the late‐flowering phenotype of fd‐2 mutants, the new isolated CRISPR‐Cas9‐induced null alleles of FDP flower earlier than wild type in long days. [ 171,172 ] The alleles of fdp‐1 and fdp‐2 might retain the activity of FDP and cause a delay in flowering time dominantly.…”
Section: Regulation Of Plant Architecture By Ft and Tfl1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 14 ] FDP has a complementary expression pattern with FD in the SAM during floral transition. [ 171,172 ] Although fdp‐1 and fdp‐2 , the point mutations in the DNA‐binding domain of FDP, cause a slightly late‐flowering phenotype and could enhance the late‐flowering phenotype of fd‐2 mutants, the new isolated CRISPR‐Cas9‐induced null alleles of FDP flower earlier than wild type in long days. [ 171,172 ] The alleles of fdp‐1 and fdp‐2 might retain the activity of FDP and cause a delay in flowering time dominantly.…”
Section: Regulation Of Plant Architecture By Ft and Tfl1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 171,172 ] Although fdp‐1 and fdp‐2 , the point mutations in the DNA‐binding domain of FDP, cause a slightly late‐flowering phenotype and could enhance the late‐flowering phenotype of fd‐2 mutants, the new isolated CRISPR‐Cas9‐induced null alleles of FDP flower earlier than wild type in long days. [ 171,172 ] The alleles of fdp‐1 and fdp‐2 might retain the activity of FDP and cause a delay in flowering time dominantly. Genome‐wide analysis of FD‐ and FDP‐binding sites shows that both FD and FDP are enriched in G‐box sequences, whereas only FD targets genes relevant to flowering time regulation.…”
Section: Regulation Of Plant Architecture By Ft and Tfl1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the two fully male-specific genes ( Figure 5B), YY_140950.1 encodes a nucleic acid binding protein. The other gene, YY_141140.1, encodes a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) protein required for the positive regulation of flowering (Romera-Branchat et al, 2020). The presence of both gene sequences was restricted to the male in spinach ( Figure S14A).…”
Section: Gene Contents Of the Sex Determination Region Of The X And Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paralogous proteins FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) represent the output of this pathway ( Kardailsky et al, 1999 ; Kobayashi et al, 1999 ; Yamaguchi et al, 2005 ). FT and TSF are transcribed specifically under LDs in the leaf vasculature, and the FT protein is transported to the SAM, where it interacts with 14-3-3 proteins and a bZIP transcription factor, FD, to promote the transcription of floral integrator genes ( Abe et al, 2005 ; Abe et al, 2019 ; Collani et al, 2019 ; Corbesier et al, 2007 ; Jaeger and Wigge, 2007 ; Mathieu et al, 2007 ; Romera-Branchat et al, 2020 ; Tamaki et al, 2007 ; Taoka et al, 2011 ). The earliest known gene to respond directly to FT/FD at the SAM is SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 ( SOC1 ) that encodes a MADS-domain type transcription factor ( Lee et al, 2000 ; Samach et al, 2000 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%