1995
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00280-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
44
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
11
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The asymmetry displayed by control subjects is in line with findings of Reite et al (1989) and Nakasato et al (1995) of more anterior right and more posterior left hemispheric N100m sources, this asymmetry being larger in male subjects than in female subjects. However, both male and female patients in our study displayed more anterior left hemispheric sources, in contrast to the results of Reite et al (1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The asymmetry displayed by control subjects is in line with findings of Reite et al (1989) and Nakasato et al (1995) of more anterior right and more posterior left hemispheric N100m sources, this asymmetry being larger in male subjects than in female subjects. However, both male and female patients in our study displayed more anterior left hemispheric sources, in contrast to the results of Reite et al (1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For example, right hemisphere N1m generators are of greater amplitude (Kanno et al, 1996) and cover a larger area (Zouridakis et al, 1998) in the auditory cortex than do left hemisphere N1m generators. In the present study, N1m source location was more anterior in the right than in the left hemisphere, which is in agreement with previous whole-head MEG studies (Mäkelä et al, 1993;Nakasato et al, 1995;Pantev et al, 1998). This observation can be explained by the fact that the left temporal plane of right-handed subjects is significantly more posterior than the right (Geschwind and Levitsky, 1968;Szikla et al, 1977).…”
Section: Differences Between Hemispheressupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This study accepted only ECDs accounting for > 90% of the field variance and with confidence volume < 1 cm 3 . The single-ECD assumption is well known to account for the peak signals in previous MEG studies of SI response (Karhu et al 1991;Hari et al 1993;Kakigi 1994;Kawamura et al 1996;Nakasato et al 1996;Ohtomo et al 1996;Iwasaki et al 2001;Nagamatsu et al 2001;Nakahara et al 2004). Therefore, we used the single-ECD model for the hemispheric data contralateral to the stimulus side.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%