2020
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) item analysis of empathy and theory of mind

Abstract: In contrast to conventional functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis across participants, item analysis allows generalizing the observed neural response patterns from a specific stimulus set to the entire population of stimuli. In the present study, we perform an item analysis on an fMRI paradigm (EmpaToM) that measures the neural correlates of empathy and Theory of Mind (ToM). The task includes a large stimulus set (240 emotional vs. neutral videos to probe empathic responding and 240 ToM or fact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected this criterion to be as objective as possible, and to avoid raters guessing about whether the subjects were engaged in mentalization. This type of second-order theory of mind task activates theory of mind network (Tholen et al, 2020). As in prior studies (Saxe and Powell, 2006), the description of a character's appearance (e.g., she is tall and thin) or bodily sensation (e.g., she had been sick for three days) were not considered theory of mind.…”
Section: Movie Analysis and Annotationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected this criterion to be as objective as possible, and to avoid raters guessing about whether the subjects were engaged in mentalization. This type of second-order theory of mind task activates theory of mind network (Tholen et al, 2020). As in prior studies (Saxe and Powell, 2006), the description of a character's appearance (e.g., she is tall and thin) or bodily sensation (e.g., she had been sick for three days) were not considered theory of mind.…”
Section: Movie Analysis and Annotationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paradigm is designed to assess neural activation and behavioral performance related to social affect and cognition using a within-subjects design ( Kanske, Böckler, et al, 2015 ). An item-analysis demonstrates good reliability of the task and both the neural as well as the behavioral measures of the EmpaToM have been validated with established tasks ( Kanske, Böckler, et al, 2015 ; Tholen et al, 2020 ). We used one of the parallel versions consisting of optimized item sets identified by Tholen and colleagues (2020) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An item-analysis demonstrates good reliability of the task and both the neural as well as the behavioral measures of the EmpaToM have been validated with established tasks ( Kanske, Böckler, et al, 2015 ; Tholen et al, 2020 ). We used one of the parallel versions consisting of optimized item sets identified by Tholen and colleagues (2020) . Participants were instructed to empathize with individuals giving autobiographic narratives in short videos.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Behavioral changes of these markers elicited by the different modules are reported elsewhere (Trautwein et al, 2020). The measure for compassion was based on the EmpaToM task, a developed and validated naturalistic video paradigm in the current subjects (Kanske et al, 2015; Tholen et al, 2020). Videos showed people recounting autobiographical episodes that were either emotionally negative (e.g., loss of a loved one) or neutral (e.g., commuting to work), followed by Likert-scale ratings of experienced valence and compassion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%