2021
DOI: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional optical zone after wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

Abstract: Background: Many studies have used functional optical zone (FOZ) as a measure to compare different refractive laser treatment modalities. However, to our knowledge, no study has compared wavefrontoptimized (WFO) and wavefront-guided (WFG) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using FOZ. We compared the FOZ after WFO versus WFG LASIK in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism.Methods: In this prospective comparative study, we included 100 myopic eyes of 50 patients with or without astigmatism. They were divi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Average corneal asphericity has been calculated and analyzed in different populations, including those of China [ 2 , 3 , 8 , 9 , 13 ] , Egypt [ 14 ] , Germany [ 1 ] , the Netherlands [ 10 ] , India [ 15 ] , and the USA [ 5 , 7 , 16 ] . These studies used various topographers [ 3 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 15 ] , included different age groups, and had various sample sizes [ 3 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 15 ] ( Table 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average corneal asphericity has been calculated and analyzed in different populations, including those of China [ 2 , 3 , 8 , 9 , 13 ] , Egypt [ 14 ] , Germany [ 1 ] , the Netherlands [ 10 ] , India [ 15 ] , and the USA [ 5 , 7 , 16 ] . These studies used various topographers [ 3 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 15 ] , included different age groups, and had various sample sizes [ 3 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 15 ] ( Table 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, biometry (ZEISS IOLMaster 500; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) was used to calculate IOL power. The Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam® HR; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to measure the maximum keratometry (K1), minimum keratometry (K2), mean keratometry (Kmean) [ 13 ], and anterior chamber angle (ACA) [ 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%