2015
DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2015.2395253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Rehabilitation of the Paralyzed Upper Extremity After Spinal Cord Injury by Noninvasive Hybrid Neuroprostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, MI based BCI have been used in the rehabilitation such as after stroke or spinal cord injury [21, 22]. However, the performance of SMR-BCI varies substantially among different subjects and among sessions for the same subject even if the same decoding algorithm is used throughout the whole process due to subjects’ learning [23, 24], inconsistent modulation strategy [25] or brain stimulation [26], as well as other non-learning factors such as the shifting of electrode position [27], and changing of skin condition [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, MI based BCI have been used in the rehabilitation such as after stroke or spinal cord injury [21, 22]. However, the performance of SMR-BCI varies substantially among different subjects and among sessions for the same subject even if the same decoding algorithm is used throughout the whole process due to subjects’ learning [23, 24], inconsistent modulation strategy [25] or brain stimulation [26], as well as other non-learning factors such as the shifting of electrode position [27], and changing of skin condition [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such systems are not ready for the user to use them independently at his/her home. To establish BCI as a neuroprosthesis control for day to day users, some gaps need to be filled up, mainly to delimit the usability difference, reliability, movements in some degree of rotation (Rupp et al, 2015). It was developed the FES controller for prehension restoration in a quadriplegic person through a BCI system using electroencephalographic (EEG) signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They range from ordinary triggering of the FES via push button, complex motion capturing via optical systems or inertial sensors, to brain computer interfaces [3,4]. Simple methods lack sufficient involvement and instinctiveness, whereas physiological approaches usually require high costs regarding adaption and training with the individual patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%