2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functionally graded porous scaffolds in multiple patterns: New design method, physical and mechanical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature [23,134,136,181,182] on AM manufactured metal lattices raises the repeatability of highly porous scaffolds as a major concern that affects both reproducibility and predictability of their mechanical performance. Although FEM could predict the stiffness and strength of porous scaffolds, the accuracy of the prediction reported in most cases is low [183][184][185].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature [23,134,136,181,182] on AM manufactured metal lattices raises the repeatability of highly porous scaffolds as a major concern that affects both reproducibility and predictability of their mechanical performance. Although FEM could predict the stiffness and strength of porous scaffolds, the accuracy of the prediction reported in most cases is low [183][184][185].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gyroid surface can be expressed as [ 38 ]: where constants a , b and c govern the unit cell size in three directions [ 39 ], and they are commonly the same in the designing process to obtain isotropic properties; the constant t controls the ratio of two volumes separated by the Gyroid surface and is termed as level parameter in this study. The sheet-based Gyroid structure can be generated from two individual and non-intersected surfaces with different level parameters via a Boolean difference operation between two volumes ( G t 1 and G t 2 ) surrounded by the surfaces as illustrated in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Vijayavenkataraman et al [131] applied gradient strategies (changing rod diameter, cell size, and unit cell type) to three TPMSs (P, G, and D surface) to achieve the design of the biomimetic implants, which are satisfied with multiple requirements like porosity, modulus and pore size etc. In addition, other researchers have established gradient minimal surface structures for implants [124,[132][133][134]. However, the gradient direction of all the above implants is consistent with the loading direction, which is the longitudinal direction.…”
Section: Gradient Structure Designmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The rod diameters of each layer vary, thereby changing the overall density of the lattice structure. (2) Unit cell changes in size [124]. The implant is composed of a plurality of unit cells.…”
Section: Gradient Structure Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation