“…Here, we consider only low-frequency and common SNPs (MAF ≥ 0.5%) and report the total number of unique SNPs (regardless MAF). we assessed the accuracy of classifying five different SNP sets (summarized in Supplementary Data 22): (1) 7333 fine-mapped for 21 autoimmune diseases from Farh et al 59 (of 7747 total SNPs; 95% credible sets), (2) 3768 fine-mapped SNPs for inflammatory bowel disease from Huang et al 60 (of 4311 total SNPs; 95% credible sets), (3) 1851 SNPs (of 2225 SNPs, spanning 3025 SNPtrait pairs; stringently defined by causal posterior probability ≥ 0.95) functionally informed fine-mapped for 49 UK Biobank traits from Weissbrod et al 61 , (4) 1379 (of 1853 total SNPs with causal posterior probability ≥ 0.95) non-functionally informed fine-mapped SNPs for 49 UK Biobank traits from Weissbrod et al 61 , and (5) 14,807 SNPs from the NHGRI GWAS catalog 62,63 (2019-07-12 version; p-value < 5e−8; we note only about 5% of GWAS SNPs are expected to be causal 59 ). For each of these five SNP sets, we matched 10 control SNPs for each positive fine-mapped SNP by matching LD, MAF, and genomic element, as in the previous studies 9,10,47 ; we note that these studies emphasized the need for matching the relative genomic region distribution in performance evaluation.…”