2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2130-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental bounds on the fidelity of sensory cortical coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
244
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
13
244
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As long as this baseline activity is low, an incoming stimulus would deactivate the RSN and shift the focus from the internal state to the external environment (Deco et al, 2013). A recent study (Rumyantsev et al, 2020) demonstrated that a signal correlated over large cortical areas and orthogonal to sensory input degraded stimulus acuity, suggesting that in a high-baseline state, the internal activity can compete with the orthogonal externally evoked signal and reduce detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As long as this baseline activity is low, an incoming stimulus would deactivate the RSN and shift the focus from the internal state to the external environment (Deco et al, 2013). A recent study (Rumyantsev et al, 2020) demonstrated that a signal correlated over large cortical areas and orthogonal to sensory input degraded stimulus acuity, suggesting that in a high-baseline state, the internal activity can compete with the orthogonal externally evoked signal and reduce detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overlap of these subspaces implies that trial-to-trial variability in the noise components can corrupt the population response along the signal dimensions, thereby interfering with representation of the signal. Previous work [15] suggests that noise only interferes with the signal reprsentation if it lies in a direction defined by the derivatives of neural tuning curves, and recent work suggests that noise and signal subspaces may indeed be nearly orthogonal [14,27,28]. Because our model contains separate latent components for signal and noise, we can explicitly compare the relative angle between these subspaces.…”
Section: Visualizing Signal and Noise Subspacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of across-neuron and across-time correlations has been long debated. Much experimental and theoretical work has proposed that correlations limit the information capacity of a neural population 69 . Because these correlations reflect trial-to-trial variability that is shared across neurons or time, the detrimental effect of variability on stimulus decoding cannot be eliminated by averaging the activity of neurons or time points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%