2008 International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis 2008
DOI: 10.1109/cmd.2008.4580234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental differences of the PD measurement according to IEC 60270 and in UHF range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result coincides with the results of [11]. Protrusion was removed and the same chamber tested for PD and now PD value obtained was less than 1pC, confirming the presence of protrusion in a GIS HV conductor by literature and experimentation.…”
Section: A Protrusion On Hv Conductorsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result coincides with the results of [11]. Protrusion was removed and the same chamber tested for PD and now PD value obtained was less than 1pC, confirming the presence of protrusion in a GIS HV conductor by literature and experimentation.…”
Section: A Protrusion On Hv Conductorsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…But PD signal was initiated at positive half cycle. These results coincide with the result of [11]. So protrusion was removed and tested for PD and PD value obtained was less than 1pC.…”
Section: B Protrusion On Enclosuresupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another feature of the UHF method is its ability to provide a precise trigger signal for acoustical PD localization. Since the introduction of UHF PD measurements on transformers it has been seen as a major disadvantage that UHF measurements cannot be calibrated in terms of PD charge magnitudes [8]. But for a risk analysis under on-site conditions the apparent charge value of a PD activity is of subordinated importance compared to PD type identification (pattern recognition) and the exact location of the fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be used to discriminate between them during on-site and on-line measurements by choosing a suitable measurement frequency or by combining the conventional and the UHF technique. However, there are general uncertainties related to the comparability of the UHF measurements to conventional IEC conformant tests [7]. For example, during CIGRÉ Session 2008 the Special Reporter of Study Committee D1 asked the question: "How can the relation between the conventional PD measurement and the UHF measurement be determined and generalized?"…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%