Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2005.1582178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Fault Detection Limitations in Linear Non-Gaussian Systems

Abstract: Abstract-Sophisticated fault detection (FD) algorithms often include nonlinear mappings of observed data to fault decisions, and simulation studies are used to support the methods. Objective statistically supported performance analysis of FD algorithms is only possible for some special cases, including linear Gaussian models. The goal here is to derive general statistical performance bounds for any FD algorithm, given a non-linear non-Gaussian model of the system. Recent advances in numerical algorithms for no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure (14) the desired threshold T is 9.64 dB. Interpolating between T = 5 dB and T = 10 dB in Figure ( Tables (4) and (5) illustrates the percentage number of ones versus SNR computed as a pure theoretical threshold which is equal to 100% and 0 % respectively, theoretical threshold as in table (3) for P F =10 -3 but applied in simulink and threshold level guessed experimentally in ATL mode, the final field for percentage number of errors for theoretical threshold level applied in simulink and ATL experimental mode, demonstrates the slight difference between them as in Figures (16) and (17).…”
Section: Where -------------------12mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From Figure (14) the desired threshold T is 9.64 dB. Interpolating between T = 5 dB and T = 10 dB in Figure ( Tables (4) and (5) illustrates the percentage number of ones versus SNR computed as a pure theoretical threshold which is equal to 100% and 0 % respectively, theoretical threshold as in table (3) for P F =10 -3 but applied in simulink and threshold level guessed experimentally in ATL mode, the final field for percentage number of errors for theoretical threshold level applied in simulink and ATL experimental mode, demonstrates the slight difference between them as in Figures (16) and (17).…”
Section: Where -------------------12mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It turns out that this upper bound depends on something called the intrinsic accuracy of the probability density function of the noise process, see Kay and Sengupta (1993);Hendeby (2005). The more nonGaussian noise in terms of intrisic accuracy, the higher performance bound.…”
Section: What Happens If the Noise Is Non-gaussian?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several estimators are used: EKF, MMF (only Example I), PF, and PMF (representing the truth). The MMF uses a pruning algorithm, where the least probable branches in the hypotheses tree are cut off, after the introduction of the measurement information, to keep the number of parallel hypotheses at the desired level [22,23].…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%