Fundamental Realization Strategies for Multi-view Specification Environments

Atkinson, Colin; Tunjic, Christian; Möller, Torben

doi:10.1109/edoc.2015.17

Cited by 19 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is visible to internal and external clients through the endpoint EP + , and behaves as a regular GraphQL endpoint. In [ATM15], the authors distinguish between projective and synthetic multi-view modeling. The projective approach assumes a pre-existing all-encompassing system model.…”

Section: Problem Statement: Federationmentioning

confidence: 99%

GraphQL Federation: A Model-Based Approach.

Stünkel¹,

Bargen²,

Rutle³

et al. 2020

JOT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Graph Query Language (GraphQL) is a framework for developing Web Services, which works on the domain model level rather than the functions. While the declarative nature of this framework has already attracted the interest of practitioners in both academia and industry, it still lacks integration capabilities. This shortcoming has been recognized in the industry; there exists a first tool creating a federation-a virtual integrated system-on top of instrumented systems. Being relatively new, it suffers from a few practical and conceptual shortcomings, such as consolidation of (conflicting) schemas and identification of multiple types. In this paper, we will analyze the federation challenge and propose a solution utilizing multi-view modeling and domain specific modeling. Our approach is accompanied by a proof-of-concept implementation and provides a model-based presentation of the GraphQL framework.

show abstract

Section: Problem Statement: Federationmentioning

confidence: 99%

GraphQL Federation: A Model-Based Approach.

Stünkel¹,

Bargen²,

Rutle³

et al. 2020

JOT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Criterion C2 (Pureness) relates to the absence of internal redundancy in the SUM under construction. An essential SUM is "completely free of any internal redundancy" (Atkinson et al, 2015) and dependencies by design. A pragmatic SUM contains redundant information (e.g., because it contains different metamodels that define concepts more than once) that has to be interrelated and kept consistent, and thus only behave as if it was free of dependencies due to internal consistency preservation mechanisms.…”

Section: Design Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In order to support the complete life-cycle of a system, ranging from requirements analysis to deployment, the internal structure of the SUM must be able to store all required data in a clean and uniform way. The data in the SUM should thus be free from dependencies and capture all relationships between its inner elements in a redundancy-free way using approaches like Information Compression and Information Expansion (Atkinson et al, 2015). Figure 2 shows an example of an OSM-oriented SUMM corresponding to the information presented in Figure 1.…”

Section: Main Ideasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single Underlying Models for Projectional, Multi-View Environments

Meier

Klare

Tunjic

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-view environments provide different views of software systems optimized for different stakeholders. One way of ensuring consistency of overlapping and interdependent information contained in such views is to project them "on demand" from a Single Underlying Model (SUM). However, there are various ways of building and evolving such SUMs. This paper presents criteria to distinguish them, describes three archetypical approaches for building SUMs, and analyzes their advantages and disadvantages. From these criteria, guidelines for choosing which approach to use in specific application areas are derived.

show abstract

“…The author wishes to thank the reviewers whose comments helped improve this paper. Some of the insightful references provided [3,4,8,11,13,18] could not be integrated due to lack of time, but will be in an extended version.…”

Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experience report on the development of a specialized multi-view multi-stakeholder model-based engineering framework

Guernic¹

2019

Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGPLAN International Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports on industrial experimentations to develop a dedicated model-based framework (process and tool support) aimed at supporting a subset of an existing documentbased engineering process involving different teams belonging to two main stakeholders. The process supported covers the design of security related products by a prime contractor, and the supervision of this work by the contracting authority. This paper provides more details on this process, the requirements for the model-based engineering framework, and the work achieved. It then discusses the first results obtained from those experimentations, the lessons learned, and provides feedback for future similar works. Those relate mainly around: the benefits of an explicit and detailed methodology; the customizability of a general modeling language such as SysML for the development of a specialized model-based framework; and the importance of the distinction and clear definition of the problem domain, which correspond to the semantics of the models, and the solution domain, which corresponds to the syntax of the models. CCS Concepts • General and reference → Experimentation; • Computing methodologies → Modeling methodologies; • Applied computing → Computer-aided design; • Software and its engineering → Model-driven software engineering; System modeling languages.

show abstract

Fundamental Realization Strategies for Multi-view Specification Environments

Cited by 19 publications

References 9 publications

GraphQL Federation: A Model-Based Approach.

GraphQL Federation: A Model-Based Approach.

Single Underlying Models for Projectional, Multi-View Environments

Experience report on the development of a specialized multi-view multi-stakeholder model-based engineering framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About